@Mauss said in England Vs All Blacks:
@pakman said in England Vs All Blacks:
This seems to chime with your analysis:
Check out Penaud's kick chase!
Some interesting points in there. I don’t disagree with their take that Penaud is a somewhat lazy chaser but I do disagree with their claim that Le Garrec’s box-kicking was on point. Multiple of his box kicks were quite deep inside the Bok 22; not even Kolbe would’ve gotten there in time. Bielle-Biarrey, who puts in a lot more effort, wasn’t able to reach multiple Le Garrec kicks either.
Also, their argument that Penaud’s lazy chase in the 2nd half – “3 steps worth of effort changed the game” – is not very convincing, as I felt that South Africa pretty much battered the French throughout that game. If it weren’t for that red card, I think you’re looking at a Wellington-type 2nd half for France.
Their point about a changed French kicking game, and how it compounded certain errors in areas like defensive kick receipt, is well made though.
Watched the Boks game in Edinburgh pub while eating a (delicious) bacon chop, so didn’t really get read on Q3, but Q4 was a bit like Wellington.
Parallels in H1, too, as home team had the advantage, but Boks kept in it by soft tries (Kolbe intercept and Reinach chip and chase).
Boks seem to have built recent success around short but high kicks whereas France traditionally kicks longer.
Boks have also become surgical at punishing teams behind on scoreboard and overplaying in Q4.