Good explanation. That's the call based on the framework.
But of course, how often does that happen?
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
Could easily have been red based on precedent.
Attempt to wrap would always save him I think
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
Could easily have been red based on precedent.
Nup - shoulders and force not apparent
@Derm-McCrum said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
White goes down like a sack of potatoes.
Brilliant play 
@antipodean said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
This far into
thethis RWC, that's entirely uncontroversial.
Fixed
@NTA said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
Could easily have been red based on precedent.
Nup - shoulders and force not apparent
I'm not saying he didn't make the correct call.
But with what's gone on before and a French ref in charge fuck knows what could have been given.
@NTA said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
He won't get this
Well that's my one reverse curse used up
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
@NTA said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: Australia v Georgia (Pool D):
Could easily have been red based on precedent.
Nup - shoulders and force not apparent
I'm not saying he didn't make the correct call.
But with what's gone on before and a French ref in charge fuck knows what could have been given.
This particular French ref has been ok from the coupler of games I've seen him





