@gunner said in Hurricanes v Lions:
I’m watching on replay, and she’s half time.
Canes played a lot of rugby, should be ahead by more.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS REF?
He’s good for sweet f all.Lions playing off their feet at rucks, playing at the ball, slowing it down, what ever the hell they like really. Canes try it and they get nailed.
Christie isn’t a super quality 9. Fucking muppet.
Yup
@gunner said in Hurricanes v Lions:
I’m watching on replay, and she’s half time.
Canes played a lot of rugby, should be ahead by more.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS REF?
He’s good for sweet f all.Lions playing off their feet at rucks, playing at the ball, slowing it down, what ever the hell they like really. Canes try it and they get nailed.
Christie isn’t a super quality 9. Fucking muppet.
And he has red hair.
I really don't see how Ardie is still in consideration either. Time to move on. He's bloody lazy on defence and just an absolute glory hunter. He's only there if it's "on".
@bones said in Hurricanes v Lions:
I really don't see how Ardie is still in consideration either. Time to move on. He's bloody lazy on defence and just an absolute glory hunter. He's only there if it's "on".
Im wondering if Taufua gets a chance at Ardie's expense. The 7 cover is needed less with Todd around. Ardie's career to date has been pretty disappointing. After tge RWC I had predicted that both Saveas would be the stars of that Lions tour. Both were pretty much a flop. Hopefully the Ioanes can become what they should have as a pair.
Well, got the job done in the end. Mixed some high quality periods of play with some utterly braindead stuff - that's been a bit of a trend this year and I can't help but think we'll be punished in our remaining away derby matches for the dumb stuff. We basically gifted the Lions their first two tries, very frustrating.
I'm usually pretty relaxed about the reffing as it's a tough job, but bloody hell I felt like I was watching a different game to him at times. Some baffling calls, against both sides to he fair.
Our wingers were the MOTMs. Lam is such a classy finisher, makes it look easy at times when he has no space - that screams test quality to me, give that man a black shirt. Jules also had a very strong game, not back in AB contention but happy to see him playing well again.
Was disappointed we couldn't ram home he advantage in the final 20. Eves was getting utterly muched in the scrums and we just made silly mistakes.
Oh... I think this game probably answered any questions about RR. Really not a smart player. The more pressure is applied the more he crumbles... Will be interesting to see what happens come playoff time.
@bones said in Hurricanes v Lions:
I really don't see how Ardie is still in consideration either. Time to move on. He's bloody lazy on defence and just an absolute glory hunter. He's only there if it's "on".
I'm expecting that they'll pick six loose forwards - though it's possible that they'd pick five or even seven if they decided to pick Fifita as the fourth locking option. But assuming it's six, then the only absolute cast iron certainty is Sam Cane - though they'll pick the other five from six (maybe seven) contenders.
I think Fifita is highly likely, especially since he played the last couple of tests. Squire should get picked as long as he's fit and has a game or two under his belt.
If you assume those three, then I'd choose Todd, Ioane and Whitelock - and that would be two each of openside, blindside and No. 8 - with a fair bit of crossover utility.
Other contenders would include Ardie and Taufua and just maybe Frizzell, but I think it's too early for him. Might be someone else I'm overlooking? Ardie's realistically the only one with much shot of pushing out one of these six - if he would get picked ahead of Todd, or if the selectors really wanted his test experience on the bench.
However, if Squire isn't fit (and I am correct), it becomes a lot more interesting. To retain the balance, you'd theoretically pick another 8/6, which should be Taufua or Frizzell (or someone else) ahead of Ardie.
Savea did an awful tackle on malcom marx last weekend. A dangerous clean out and Marx is out for 6 weeks....
@wairau Someone has gone to some significant effort with that, but to be honest it shows me bugger all.
The first seven frames are all lead up work.
What's important is how we get from frame seven (with Marx's left leg being lifted) to frame nine where he's (presumably) lying there injured.
Frame 8 shows someone's leg sticking out at a strange angle. To be honest I'm wondering how the hell Ardie managed to get Marx's legs there - if indeed they're Marx's.
But more I'm wondering why the guy who compiled this didn't expend his efforts between frames 7 and 9!
Red lines are fine but I far prefer arrows otherwise I don't know what I'm meant to be looking at.
lol at the comediennes above
Yeah, not pretty, sorry, if I have time I will revert. Till then, it's sufficient. Took all of 2 minutes to make. The lines point out the 2 protagonists. Yes, 1 is Marx's leg sticking straight up. For me, dangerous, perhaps yellow card or citing. Others? I googled Marky Marx and pro-writers are blaming him being exhausted for the injury-they're blind-but no one replayed the incident.
all the people talking about frame by frame on Moody -so I spent a few minutes revisiting this video. I am interested in other's opinions about fair punishment for Savea. Too late, I know, but just for the debate.
To avoid mess/page confusion, I deleted the earlier images...
@Wairau Im unsure what you are claiming.
It wasn't a lift nor was it a neck roll. What was the illegality? Savea held Marx and went to round. Marx looks to have eventually gone off his feet and rolled over the ruck. His injury was caused by trying to stay up with one leg planted while his body was being pulled elsewhere.
Well, I am not sure if it is illegal-seems very dangerous and directly caused an injury, I am seeking other's opinions. Savea has tackled him. Not lifted him per se, but has in effect tipped him and purposefully caused him to do a somersault and dangerously dumped him on his head.
I can't for the life of me see where he has been 'dumped' or landed on his head.
If I was defending a citing here I would be arguing that injury was caused by Marx fighting against the tackle. It was an accident.
I think I said dumped on his head, landed on his back. Picture 4 shows him heading down (then camera zooms out). Picture 5 shows he has completely flipped over. I can show the inbetweens, but logically they show him flipped upside down-from a distance. Would you like to see that?
@crucial I actually slowed down my video, to allow me to go frame by frame, and it is a neck roll. Lam is on the other side of Marx and Savea. Both Lam and Savea grab Marx around the neck and the added weight of Lam helps tip Marx downwards to the side, then Savea lifts him up and completes the flip over, onto his head and back. Clear.
@crucial said in Hurricanes v Lions:
If I was defending a citing here I would be arguing that injury was caused by Marx fighting against the tackle. It was an accident.
and you would be wrong....
Edit: Marx is out of the series Boks Vs England, which is a shame.
@rebound Agree on pts 1-3, disagree on 4. Dangerous tackles get punished all the time, as they should.
You are making a blanket generalization but I am making specific points about this tackle. 1. Everyone missed it. 2. It was needlessly dangerous and perhaps should have been cited. 3. If this had happened to Ben Smith in a test against South Africa, and caused similar injury, plenty of people would be condemning the tackle, and dangerous back flip.
Shades of a certain tackle in a Lions test....
Cheers.
I've gone back to my recorded game. Yeah there is no punishment required as nothing was illegal. It's legal to roll someone off the ruck, sadly this time it resulted in an injury. It was neither a neck roll nor a spear tackle, he did not get upside down like BoD. If people were cited every time they caused an injury, there be no one left to play. Just bad luck.
@machpants Well, please slow down your recording and check again.....he did get upside down, he flipped over (you can see it happening and the resulting position is evidence-he was twisted and flipped over the ruck, not rolled off the ruck. He was held around the neck by two players and speared down then over.
I am not arguing about all the other injuries and tackles, so your straw man is needless. This one was missed because it happened so quickly as the camera zoomed out and was not clear. But, we should be honest, not gloss over it just because Savea is popular.
I was just curious if anyone sees or cares. I guess not. Carry on, then.
@wairau said in Hurricanes v Lions:
@machpants Well, please slow down your recording and check again.....he did get upside down, he flipped over (you can see it happening and the resulting position is evidence-he was twisted and flipped over the ruck, not rolled off the ruck. He was held around the neck by two players and speared down then over.
I am not arguing about all the other injuries and tackles, so your straw man is needless. This one was missed because it happened so quickly as the camera zoomed out and was not clear. But, we should be honest, not gloss over it just because Savea is popular.
I was just curious if anyone sees or cares. I guess not. Carry on, then.
Held around the neck by two players? Speared? I'm only going by the pics but I can't see how you come to those accusations.
If anything look at pics 1 and 2. AS tries to clear MM out but MM holds strong with power through his left leg. Nothing illegal has happened.
The forces involved mean that AS (who is pushing off his left leg) shears off to the left and over the ruck. Instead of going with the movement MM stays strong on the left leg and twists (causing his groin injury). Still nothing illegal has happened (as long as there was no neck roll). So we have an injury caused by general play. If MM had the moment again he would probably choose to go with the movement rather than fight against it and therefore avoid injury.
Yes, he eventually gives in and rolls over the ruck, but at no point was lifted, so nothing illegal.
Players often end up on the ground rolling over their shoulders in a tackle.
Comparing this with the BOD incident is bizarre. AS was perfectly entitled to do what he did and it was only because MM held strong that an injury happened. Tough shit.
OK, I will try to use other pictures to answer some of this:
Pic 1 shows Lam and AS. PL clearly has a neck roll hold on MM, while AS is shown with his right arm over the shoulder against the neck of MM.
-PL then rolls down to his right, as does AS, forcing MM's head down and his hips up, which was shown in my other photos, and pic 2 here.
Crucial, given PL has his head in a neck roll, and AS is lifting his leg to the right, there was nothing MM could do but try to remain stable with his one planted leg.
I compared it with BOD becasue here we have 2 players (PL neck roll, AS lift of leg and tip) causing a similar tip and tumble..last picture shows MM's left leg, and right foot, where MM has clearly down a somersault due to PL's neck roll and AS's lifting his right leg.
@wairau said in Hurricanes v Lions:
OK, I will try to use other pictures to answer some of this:
Pic 1 shows Lam and AS. PL clearly has a neck roll hold on MM, while AS is shown with his right arm over the shoulder against the neck of MM.
Not clear to me. PL can easily be grasping MMs jersey and keeping his arm away from the neck (neck roll indicates a lock on the neck/head). AS is shown with his right arm.....somewhere..... if that blur in from of PLs face is AS's right arm then it looks like he is in contact on MMs right shoulder, not around his neck. Either way the evidence is weak
@crucial 
PL's arm is on top of AS's arm, both wrapped around the neck, and from the angle they drag him, they would be putting a lot of force on his neck.
edit: where was MM's support? Not only were our guys reckless and dangerous, but he was left exposed. Also, did AS come in from the side? How much leeway is he given for entry?
That's enough from me on this topic. Cheers
you need a lesson in damning stills, and bold red arrow placement from that delusional Aussie bloke. Video with boring monologue over the top is also appreciated.
I can't see anything but a pile of arms and legs, and can't tell who is who. Almost makes me miss the days when players from different positions had different body shapes. Ah the 90s aye @MN5 ?
But, based on experience, if we are charging A Savea with doing something physical, and actually being involved in tough stuff, then weight of evidence says not guilty.
From that pic, all I see is a Canes player getting speared underneath it all.
Call the citing commissioner 
@mariner4life said in Hurricanes v Lions:
you need a lesson in damning stills, and bold red arrow placement from that delusional Aussie bloke. Video with boring monologue over the top is also appreciated.
I can't see anything but a pile of arms and legs, and can't tell who is who. Almost makes me miss the days when players from different positions had different body shapes. Ah the 90s aye @MN5 ?
But, based on experience, if we are charging A Savea with doing something physical, and actually being involved in tough stuff, then weight of evidence says not guilty.
Absolutely. Royce Willis and Norm Maxwell locking the scrum, Isi Maka off the back. Mayerhofler at centre. Marvellous.
on here that would delight in sticking the boot into him if this was true.