@billy-tell said in All Blacks vs USA:
Yes every team must always and without exception consist of the top 23. Development is a dirty word.
Who said that? Not I.
@crucial said in All Blacks vs USA:
A bit insulting.
I'm sure Josh Lord's parents feel very differently.
The All Blacks are about pandering to peoples parents?
@bones said in All Blacks vs USA:
@majorrage said in All Blacks vs USA:
That’s an abortion of a team.
Why?
Not convinced about Aumua, Whitelock the only forward with any decent experience, Christie is poor in my view, Bridge has zero x-factor,
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs USA:
Looks like an exciting team that would bend over double against a top group of forwards, which I assume the US of A still doesn't have...
Yes, I agree. It's a team to beat a poor team.
@bones said in All Blacks vs USA:
Yeah that's all I can come up with. Let's see....
A debutant, but in an area where our stocks are awfully low, and off the bench. Green front row, but 2 players who have proven themselves at T1 level and another who is a capable journeyman. One of our best locks and another next gen player beside him. A loose trio who a lot wouldn't have minded seeing together this year. Halfback hasn't been great shakes at SR but looks comfortable in black. 10 could be our best, 14 many think is our best, 15 is our second best, 12 many think could be a future best, 13 keeps getting selected so must be doing something right.
Oh.
George Bridge.
You are way off with you number 9 call, but rest looks right.