Yeah - I thought Leicester went well - influential.
Though Dom Gardiner had a really good game as well.
Newell, Shalfoon, Kemara and McLeod the others who caught my eye.
Kemara's goal-kicking last year was so awful it kind of blinded me to his other merits. Goal-kicking is much improved and he's got some game in general play.
Generally liked the resolve shown - plenty of determination not to lose this first game in the new house.
Leicester F at 7 makes more sense under the roof as opposed to a wet windy bog of a ground.
We saw the value of Meg as an expert commentator when he talked up Bell winning that breakdown penalty. It was so obvious in real time that both of Bell's hands went pass the ball and touched the ground. Silence when a replay was shown.
@canefan said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
No seats at the ends?
Temporary stand can go in there for a test match much like Forsyth Barr
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
@canefan said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
No seats at the ends?
Temporary stand can go in there for a test match much like Forsyth Barr
The top tier looks supported by steel as opposed to concrete. Looks pretty good though, the stands sitting close to the field
@canefan said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
No seats at the ends?
At on end there is a stand at the other end
The other end has cooperate stands etc,
Another 5000 seats go in there for test matches etc.
I saw absoute fucking nothing to show LF can play 7. To the loosies in the squad, get out!
My comments about LF included, giving away the first penalty, while looking completely clueless at the interpretation. Not hitting rucks. No noticeable kick chases. Some carries, nothing of note. A try off a ruck pick up, lots would do that anyway.
Is Corey Kellow unwanted?
@MajorPom said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
@jimmyb said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
@Bones said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
Also just realised he doesn't have his legs strapped for the lineout.
And he smashes over for a try
Marshall “overwhelming success”. Fuck me
Although I agree this rhetoric is slightly OTT, I'm going to go against the grain and think he's played really well.
The thing is that once this was was called, he was always going to be watched like a hawk with folks only looking for actions for confirm their pre conceived bias.
Has he been an amazing 7? No. Has he been a decent enough 7 to play there at Super Rugby level? Definitely. He's been heavily involved, I think Marshall said he''s had 6 more carries than the next best player. Thus, he's unquestionably been much more involved than he would have been at 12. He's always been a strong runner, with huge drive, so playing at 7 does give him more time to get his hands on the ball & he's literally grabbed it with both hands.
Overall, he's been brilliant
Brilliant. Fuck off. He's been as involved as a winger looking for work. As a flanker he's been a non-entity.
Just watched the highlights and hard to see from it but can someone please explain the lead up to the first Tahs YC please?
Looked like the bringing down of the maul was legal because it was a tackle
Then the ref blows for a penalty ????
And as the penalised player is talking with the ref the Crusaders player takes a quick tap, runs into a defender and the defender gets a YC
Can someone make sense of it all please?
@MiketheSnow said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
Just watched the highlights and hard to see from it but can someone please explain the lead up to the first Tahs YC please?
Looked like the bringing down of the maul was legal because it was a tackle
Then the ref blows for a penalty ????
And as the penalised player is talking with the ref the Crusaders player takes a quick tap, runs into a defender and the defender gets a YC
Can someone make sense of it all please?
You can certainly make a case whether there should've been a penalty or not in the first place, but the yellow card was spot on. Miles Amatosero tackles the Crusaders player who takes the quick tap without retreating back 10 metres - pretty blatant.
@MiketheSnow said in Crusaders Vs Waratahs:
Just watched the highlights and hard to see from it but can someone please explain the lead up to the first Tahs YC please?
Looked like the bringing down of the maul was legal because it was a tackle
Then the ref blows for a penalty ????
And as the penalised player is talking with the ref the Crusaders player takes a quick tap, runs into a defender and the defender gets a YC
Can someone make sense of it all please?
The first player is entirely permitted to be where he is because the ball hasn't been transferred, so it's open play. Once the original tackler goes in and the ball doesn't go to ground it's a maul. In which case the second Tahs player joins offside. That's a clear penalty.
Hotham tries to take a quick tap and the Tahs lock grabs him within the 10m. Deliberate and YC worthy.
Thanks guys
Guess it was a timing issue for the second Tahs player
After that it all makes sense
Most important aspect of this game was the packed crowd. Time to take a sledgehammer to the cake tin and the cemetery with chips
The new stadium looks great and fantastic to see it a sell-out on opening night.
Take a bow, Christchurch.
