Match thread

KiwiMurph

Mounga might be cited for that hit under these laws.

taniwharugby

if that deserves more than a penalty, then the hightackle that wasnt released earlier warrants more attanetion

Gunner

Stormers getting away with hitting rucks from all angles and also going off their feet a hell of a lot.

KiwiMurph

Brilliant try Stormers.

Crusaders havent woken up this half.

Gunner

Crusaders have done 5 fifths of fuck all in the 15 minutes of this half.

Gunner

They’re playing too much footy
In their own half.
Did Mounga have his right foot amputated at half time?

taniwharugby

@gunner yeah not sure what he was up to in those movements...

taniwharugby

Mounga parts the Stormers to run in a nice try

taniwharugby

interesting that a deliberate knock back is seen different to a failed intercept knock forward, in that case was no way he was going to get the ball and was only slapping back to stop the pass.

Stargazer

Fuck, I'm reading that Mo'unga may have a broken jaw. How long does that take to heal?

Damo

@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Stormers:

interesting that a deliberate knock back is seen different to a failed intercept knock forward, in that case was no way he was going to get the ball and was only slapping back to stop the pass.

Why is it interesting? Knocking the ball backwards is perfectly legal.

taniwharugby

@damo I realize it is legal, just stating how I saw that play, the action was deliberate knock, we see some genuine intercepts penalized yet he was never going to get the ball, just slapped at it, IMO is just as bad as the other way.

Damo

@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Stormers:

@damo the action was deliberate knock, we see some genuine intercepts penalized yet he was never going to get the ball, IMO is just as bad as the other way.

Yes but it was a deliberate knock backwards, which is totally fine and within both the laws and spirit of the game. Playing the ball backwards is an integral part of rugby.

Might seem wrong, but it shouldn't.

Damo

Saders were a big lucky to get the bonus point. They really let that game slip in the second half.

Scrum was a worry as was their ability to turn the ball over under these new laws.

Stargazer

@damo said in Crusaders v Stormers:

Saders were a big lucky to get the bonus point. They really let that game slip in the second half.

Scrum was a worry as was their ability to turn the ball over under these new laws.

Not surprised the second half didn't go that well; Ryan Crotty (calf muscle), Jordan Taufua (head/face) and Pete Samu (shoulder) were all subbed during the break due to injury. They had to shift Tamanivalu to centre, Barrett to 6 and introduce Mataele, Bedwell-Curtiss and Romano early.

Because of the Crusaders' depth, it's easy to forget how many first choice players they were already missing, but it's bound to affect their play. Moody, Franks, Todd, Read, in particular, were sorely missed.

I also think it was a great effort to stop the Stormers from scoring at the end of the game; they played the last 5 minutes with 14 players after Mo'unga went off, because they'd ran out of subs. And then in the final minute, Harmon got a yellow.

@damo Yep as soon if you couldn't knock a ball backwards there would be a lot of lineout forward penalised wouldn't there.