Aussie Pro Rugby

NTA

Ioane Moananu signed by the Tahs.

alt text

Duluth

@NTA

Tahs could not get his position correct in the image

NTA

@Duluth said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@NTA

Tahs could not get his position right in the image

Keep in mind that a lot of the Tahs operations have been centralised under RA, as a first point.

I'll tell you - for free - that the corporates who run our game nationally have Fuck ๐Ÿ‘ All ๐Ÿ‘ Idea ๐Ÿ‘ about rugby

NTA

A few have chipped in the hooker thing in the comments.

Nepia

Is he eligible for Australia? And if not how does he not have a NZ contract?

NTA

@NTA said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@Duluth said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@NTA

Tahs could not get his position right in the image

Keep in mind that a lot of the Tahs operations have been centralised under RA, as a first point.

I'll tell you - for free - that the corporates who run our game nationally have Fuck ๐Ÿ‘ All ๐Ÿ‘ Idea ๐Ÿ‘ about rugby

Maybe "amok" ?

369e6c4c-4f00-480d-b6de-ad8b4dbd5020-image.png

NTA

QLD lock Angus Blyth signs with the Tahs.

With Matt Philip also coming to Sydney it gives us some decent options

19 days later

barbarian

Been thinking about the general positioning and talk of rugby in Australia.

For all the talk of rugby dying, or being 'back', I actually think we've found our level over the last 5-10 years and it's where we will stay.

We're a second tier rugby nation, on and off the field. There's enough support to sustain a viable Super competition, 6-8 Wallabies games a year and the odd Lions tour or World Cup. We will field competitive rugby sides that may have the odd good spell but will never be dominant.

Within the sporting landscape here, our place is to sit below AFL, NRL and cricket but above basketball, soccer and netball.

It's not super interesting to discuss, but I think that's how it is. And I'm largely OK with it, but it does mean accepting that a World Cup win in my lifetime may be a bit of a long shot.

Kiwiwomble

it very interesting as weve just a week back in NZ and two things i took from the week after the melbourne lions test

the coverage on the news in NZ of the game was 2-3 longer than what we would have got in aussie...which is wild....so i think IF they did want to make rugby even slightly more popular....they need to get the coverage on side

secondly....loads more people went to the game than i thought would, i had a saffa, english and american guy from work say they got some tickets and went, i think everyone from my club went, it was awesome to see

mariner4life

My entire view of picking overseas players is reversed now that i understand Will Skelton goes home today. Fucking loved watching him running around the track grinning as he made an absolute menace of himself. Will be sorely missed, especially in South Africa

barbarian

In a way it actually makes me firmer in my views. What if it was eight blokes getting on a plane instead of one?

mariner4life

fair point.

Economics are a bitch.

MiketheSnow

@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

Been thinking about the general positioning and talk of rugby in Australia.

For all the talk of rugby dying, or being 'back', I actually think we've found our level over the last 5-10 years and it's where we will stay.

We're a second tier rugby nation, on and off the field. There's enough support to sustain a viable Super competition, 6-8 Wallabies games a year and the odd Lions tour or World Cup. We will field competitive rugby sides that may have the odd good spell but will never be dominant.

Within the sporting landscape here, our place is to sit below AFL, NRL and cricket but above basketball, soccer and netball.

It's not super interesting to discuss, but I think that's how it is. And I'm largely OK with it, but it does mean accepting that a World Cup win in my lifetime may be a bit of a long shot.

A realistic if slightly pessimistic appraisal

How old are you?

gt12

@barbarian said in Wallabies vs Lions III:

In a way it actually makes me firmer in my views. What if it was eight blokes getting on a plane instead of one?

I want to agree with @mariner4life point, because with Skelton vs without the Wallabies are just better.

But if you continually pick from overseas, there are no good places to draw the line. Giteau rule etc are all just arbitrary.

For me, it depends on whether we are prepared to give up our domestic rugby competitions as โ€˜premierโ€™ comps or not. Arguably we already have but thatโ€™s a different topic.

To stay on topic, it was clear at the start of the series that the Wobs with Bobby V and Skelton would be a different beast. Both of them are fit and available from test 1 and the wallabies win that series, I think - probably still losing the first but winning the second so at least weโ€™d have had a decider.

barbarian

@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

Been thinking about the general positioning and talk of rugby in Australia.

For all the talk of rugby dying, or being 'back', I actually think we've found our level over the last 5-10 years and it's where we will stay.

We're a second tier rugby nation, on and off the field. There's enough support to sustain a viable Super competition, 6-8 Wallabies games a year and the odd Lions tour or World Cup. We will field competitive rugby sides that may have the odd good spell but will never be dominant.

Within the sporting landscape here, our place is to sit below AFL, NRL and cricket but above basketball, soccer and netball.

It's not super interesting to discuss, but I think that's how it is. And I'm largely OK with it, but it does mean accepting that a World Cup win in my lifetime may be a bit of a long shot.

A realistic if slightly pessimistic appraisal

How old are you?

I am 37. Maybe slightly pessimistic. But I'd peg it at maybe 20% chance? We weren't that far away in 2015, if you get a good draw and the bounce of the ball you never know.

antipodean

On the discussion about selection of OS based players, you'll be hard pressed to find someone who thinks Skelton shouldn't be in the Wallabies every available match and then some.

But what should be equally obvious to my mind is he wouldn't have become the player he is today without having made the move.

And to cement my next point I look at how well Jordie has come back.

So it seems to me from a narrow pool of evidence that the quality of coaching and squad competition in the Top14 etc. may now be as good - if not better - than it is down here.

MiketheSnow

@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:

Been thinking about the general positioning and talk of rugby in Australia.

For all the talk of rugby dying, or being 'back', I actually think we've found our level over the last 5-10 years and it's where we will stay.

We're a second tier rugby nation, on and off the field. There's enough support to sustain a viable Super competition, 6-8 Wallabies games a year and the odd Lions tour or World Cup. We will field competitive rugby sides that may have the odd good spell but will never be dominant.

Within the sporting landscape here, our place is to sit below AFL, NRL and cricket but above basketball, soccer and netball.

It's not super interesting to discuss, but I think that's how it is. And I'm largely OK with it, but it does mean accepting that a World Cup win in my lifetime may be a bit of a long shot.

A realistic if slightly pessimistic appraisal

How old are you?

I am 37. Maybe slightly pessimistic. But I'd peg it at maybe 20% chance? We weren't that far away in 2015, if you get a good draw and the bounce of the ball you never know.

Iโ€™m 59 this year and still think Wales can do it in my lifetime

barbarian

@antipodean It's certainly one of the big arguments in favour of letting players go.

But you have to draw the distinction of playing top tier Euro rugby and what happens in Japan. I don't think you could find many who get better by playing at Suntory, or wherever.

Which is why, to me, the Giteau rule is a better approach than an open borders policy.