@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@booboo said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Been thinking about the general positioning and talk of rugby in Australia.
For all the talk of rugby dying, or being 'back', I actually think we've found our level over the last 5-10 years and it's where we will stay.
We're a second tier rugby nation, on and off the field. There's enough support to sustain a viable Super competition, 6-8 Wallabies games a year and the odd Lions tour or World Cup. We will field competitive rugby sides that may have the odd good spell but will never be dominant.
Within the sporting landscape here, our place is to sit below AFL, NRL and cricket but above basketball, soccer and netball.
It's not super interesting to discuss, but I think that's how it is. And I'm largely OK with it, but it does mean accepting that a World Cup win in my lifetime may be a bit of a long shot.
I'm surprised at your assessment of being above soccer though.
Super Rugby is more popular than the A-League. While the Socceroos and Matildas capture the national attention every four years (moreso than Union ever does), itβs pretty barren outside of that.
Rugby has a reliable annual schedule of games against traditional rivals. Soccer is erratic, games at odd intervals against tinpot Central Asian nations.
The soccer guys would be looking at the Lions series with green eyed envy. Theyβd love something like that. It would fill stadiums the same way. But itβs just not possible.
Which is a long way of saying soccer could be more popular than rugby if things were a certain way. But they wonβt ever be like that.
The gut feel test is that i seem to see/hear more A League news than Super Rugby news.







