@mariner4life said in Aussie Open:
That era may very well be completely over. And there is just nothing behind them. Tennis has ignored the next guys (because really they were irrelevant) but now needs them
It's been hard for them because picking who the next big thing is has been impossible. Blokes have bobbed up here and there - Thiem, Tsitsipas, Zverev, Medvedev, Dimitrov - but none have really had a prolonged run of success.
It's the ultimate meritocracy in many ways, which means it's very hard to promote someone who may well not last a week in the tournament.
But more than that, these blokes are all pretty bland. Kyrgios stands out because he has a real personality and is unafraid of the spotlight. And it's beyond personality, it's also playing style. Just belting it back and forth from the baseline until someone makes a mistake.
There are parallels to golf without Tiger. You still have the hardcore fans, but who is the guy who makes the casual fan want to watch? It's a hard thing to force as at the end of the day the thing that needs to drive it is prolonged success on court/course.
The guy who could really be something is Sinner, the Italian. The job he did on De Minaur yesterday was scary.