And if so, who is it?
This is a philosophical discussion about rugby more than anything. More astoundingly it's sparked by a Mark Reason article.
The gist if you insist on not giving clicks to either Stuff or Reason is, rugby needs someone to capture the public, in the same sort of way that randoms can get excited by watching Messi or Mbappe. He anoints Will Jordan.
Pretty much the entire rugby world would be comfortable calling Jonah rugby's first global superstar. My question is, was he also the last, and if so, why is that?
Rugby guys have the players they love to watch. But is there really anybody that would make a casual turn the TV on to watch a guy go around at the RWC? I loke loose forwards, most people probably have no fucking idea what they are doing half the time.
Is modern elite rugby fundamentally geared against individual stardom? Look ahead to a RWC, are the chances of any main contender built around flair players? or game plans and workhorses?
Do we as fans focus far too much on errors and turnovers to ever truly embrace the guy who is having a crack? Case in point, if Jonah started now, how much of social media would be talking about his high ball work, or his defense, or his workrate? In NZ we have guys like Ioane and Jordan who are just freakish individual talents, and still they have untold critics lining up to take shots at them for all sorts of shit. Do we embrace their pace and flair and ability to tear a side up? Fuck no. Ioane is a hungus who doesn't play like Conrad Smith (great player, but not because of his flair). I am as bad as any. Beauden Barrett is a freaky footballer and i give him heaps of shit. I feel like rugby fans, especially kiwis, are way more Tim Duncan fans than Alan Iverson fans.
what do we reckon








