Wellington vs Tasman (RS)

@1kiwi isnt there requirements for the facilities around lighting for sky, and less of an issue at NPC is the ground facilities for players.

@taniwharugby Good point. The lighting requirement might rule out the Hutt Rec (not sure).

This has been a low quality game so far.

@Stargazer yep I was reading somehwere that Hutt lighting isn't up to scratch. Must admit I would prefer they played them in smaller venues.

That was 40 minutes I won’t be getting back .

Orr is on

Poor sub management. Important scrum this

Good scrum .

When are we replacing the two midgets in the halves? They are so damn average.

Get Peter Umaga-Jensen off aswell. He’s been aweful. Absolute clumsy every time he goes near the ball.

Playing like ass rn

Grabs the hb before he touched the ball

Yay PUJ off, wouldn’t mind if he went to the Highlanders to be fair.

Higgins is on thankfully

Why did they sub Kirifi off?

I tend to disagree with you lot regarding PUJ he’s ran hard all game. Why aren’t they bringing Love into attack more?

@Stargazer player management I’d say

Proctor has shut down Aumua all night long.

Oh no I can feel the momentum shift

Lakai has been rubbish this half

Tavatavanawai loves himself a Turnover

Haha

Wellington defense is good. Attack is rubbish

It would help Ta$man immensely if they had someone in the 23 who can kick at goal. That was terrible.

@Winger really missing Perenara running things from halfback. KHP is so poor.

@Stargazer massively costly both kickable

@Winger who cares about attack. Defence wins championships.

Wellington have had all the attack in the world previously and won f all.

@Canes4life said in Wellington vs Ta$man (RS):

@Winger really missing Perenara running things from halfback. KHP is so poor.

Preston on with 3 mins left

Haha, Morgan misses, too!

@Stargazer said in Wellington vs Ta$man (RS):

Haha, Morgan misses, too!

Sums up the quality of the game. Cripes.

Fck sake Morgan.

@Stargazer lol knowing him I thought he would have hit the posts.

@Canes4life said in Wellington vs Ta$man (RS):

@Winger who cares about attack. Defence wins championships.

Wellington have had all the attack in the world previously and won f all.

Except for last year. And Crusaders have both. Most winners have a good attack

And this game was a bit boring to watch.

Ta$man 1 try in 160 minutes of rugby ,who would have thought that..?, especially with a team that has Amua and Tavatavanawai

@Winger yeah but our attack didn’t click until later in the year last year so I’m not worried. Knowing we have the defence to break teams is awesome.

Boring, pfft. That’s what Shield rugby is all about.

Well I enjoyed that, proper Shield challenge. Very few tight shield games are wide open affairs and add thei was midweek of storm week for both teams. I tell you what Canterbury would have to be hot favourites against Lions on Sunday.

Preston love and Higgins to play HB 1st and 2nd vs Canterbury. Poor attack bores me so try a diff option

Both teams sufferend from having a very average 10 (O'Malley for Ta$man for most of the game). No direction whatsoever.

Defence was on point for both teams.

Also both teams making many handling errors.

Plenty of effort from both teams, too. It wasn't for lack of trying.

Like to add there were some good loosies on display, have liked Segner since I first saw him for NZ schoolboys and Lions have 3 bloody good loosies and a ormising looking kid in Ropeti.

Dire game, but Wellington retain the Log O’Wood. That’s all that really matters.