All Blacks 2024

frugby

@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby but he's been given an AB contract has he not? not just a super one?

There is no real such thing. All the players who play Super Rugby are contracted to NZR. NZR pay the salaries... All Blacks contracts are then worked into one big salary to go with performance bonuses etc.

The contract does not guarantee selection, see J Savea, Dagg in the past.

Kiwiwomble

@frugby what i mean he'll be getting paid the same as last year (or more) when he was a nailed on starter....so paying someone that way when they might not get selected seems poor business

canefan

@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby what i mean he'll be getting paid the same as last year (or more) when he was a nailed on starter....so paying someone that way when they might not get selected seems poor business

Yup. But maybe Razor sees more than we do, maybe he has value in a leadership role in the squad, and perhaps he will be the bridge to the third and fourth years of Razor's tenure

Kiwiwomble

@canefan of course, i think everything said is with the caveat of we may be proven wrong, can only base it on what weve seen to date

Bones

@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby what i mean he'll be getting paid the same as last year (or more) when he was a nailed on starter....so paying someone that way when they might not get selected seems poor business

Will he? I thought a large part of it was a blues benefactor? Plus I'm pretty sure you only get the big bucks if you get selected and played for the ABs, isn't it? A payout for selection, then per game played?

Stargazer

@Bones That's what I'm thinking, too.

Victor Meldrew

@frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@KiwiMurph

True, but the point I'm making is the circumstances are very different. A 4 year deal for BB makes less sense

Think you are missing the wider point. Is keeping our best players in New Zealand not a good thing for keeping Super Rugby strong? Even if he isn't still at his peak, he is still a great pro to have playing locally.

I'd trust Razor to make the tough calls, and to use Barrett how he sees fit in the environment. Rightly or wrongly, I think there is every chance Razor backs himself to get Beauden back playing to the best of his abilities as a 10.

No, not missing the wider point at all. As I've said, have zero problems or concerns with BB being signed up to provide continuity. I will have concerns if Robertson doesn't develop options at 10 & 15 and a 36yr-old BB is the incumbent

That's such a sweeping statement though. Absolutely possible that Razor gives him a second wind... it's not like he is 36 now, he is 32.

He'll be 36 if Robertson sticks with him until RWC2027. Not even Coach Jesus can wind clocks back

frugby

@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@KiwiMurph

True, but the point I'm making is the circumstances are very different. A 4 year deal for BB makes less sense

Think you are missing the wider point. Is keeping our best players in New Zealand not a good thing for keeping Super Rugby strong? Even if he isn't still at his peak, he is still a great pro to have playing locally.

I'd trust Razor to make the tough calls, and to use Barrett how he sees fit in the environment. Rightly or wrongly, I think there is every chance Razor backs himself to get Beauden back playing to the best of his abilities as a 10.

No, not missing the wider point at all. As I've said, have zero problems or concerns with BB being signed up to provide continuity. I will have concerns if Robertson doesn't develop options at 10 & 15 and a 36yr-old BB is the incumbent

That's such a sweeping statement though. Absolutely possible that Razor gives him a second wind... it's not like he is 36 now, he is 32.

He'll be 36 if Robertson sticks with him until RWC2027. Not even Coach Jesus can wind clocks back

Could reinvent himself though. Sexton was 37 at the RWC... I'd imagine Barrett is very disciplined with his lifestyle. We all go on about his whole game being built around pace, but I still say, let's give him a chance playing as a 10 for Razor before passing real judgement.

Bones

@frugby Sexton still being there at 37 was a symbol of Ireland's stellar backline development system. He was well past it, covered over by everyone else being so good.

Bones

@Tim I'll be extremely underwhelmed if Beauds is at fullback next year.

Tim

@Bones Who would you prefer there? Love? Sullivan? Jordan?

Bones

@Tim said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

@Bones Who would you prefer there? Love? Sullivan? Jordan?

I just hope others can step up. Going off this year I'd be looking hard at Stevenson (especially for his combination with DMac and ability to create space, as well as that big boot) and Sullivan.

Jordan can stay on the wing if he's lucky, at least he does less harm from there.

Tim

@Bones I'd love to see a Harbour player become a first choice AB (who was the last one?). Hopefully Robertson can get the best out of him.