Try awarded to Manly, but on replay the winger has dropped that.
Can’t be given, surely!
But hang on it’s the NRL, try awarded.
What a farce. Every day of the week the NRL rules that a knock on, but not today.
Warriors need to dig deep here, Manly are having their inevitable patch in the 2nd half of dominating possession…
I get that 6 again, after Wayde deliberately got held down after that break…
However that’s a professional foul, shouldn’t it be a penalty and sin bin?
Confused.
Anyway Wayde scores a couple of tackles later.
Or does he, NRL? Probably not…
Edit. Try awarded.
Commentators were carrying on like dickheads for the Saab try. They were essentially saying it was inconclusive but he likely scored before the bunker got involved, then when the bunker said the same thing they had a melt down at them.
Then silence for the Egan (no) try.
Was pleasantly surprised when I switched over from the rugby. The Saab scored and I thought I was the jinx. 
RTS has gifted everything to Manly so far, he has been terrible on the wing, every point has been scored through his horrendous defence and mistakes.
@antipodean said in NRL 2025:
Inconclusive will be the call from the bunker.
Well at least they're being consistent.
I think we miss Rocco Berrys defence too, hopefully he got through the reserves game today and is a chance to play NRL next week.
I think we miss Rocco Berrys defence too, hopefully he got through the reserves game today and is a chance to play NRL next week.
He doesn't move he. Industrious but lacking impact
As opposed to the very limited Pompey?
I think Berry has been really good in the last couple of seasons and would have him in front of Pompey by a mile.
As I type, the Warriors show a lack of composure on attack and turn it over in great field position.
What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.
I was watching the Canes, I won't risk turning the channel over and jinxing the boys, they need all the good juju they can get
@antipodean said in NRL 2025:
What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.
We always get a raw deal
@antipodean said in NRL 2025:
What knock on am I missing? It seems inconclusive means not enough evidence to rule in Warrior's favour.
The knock on that went half a metre backwards… that he didn’t even touch.
Come on, it’s pretty straight forward