it doesn't even have to be a fucking AFL coach, look at what your average NRL winger can do on either side of a ball.
Actually Marky Mark is shit under the high ball so maybe rugby backs ignore basic skills far too much
it doesn't even have to be a fucking AFL coach, look at what your average NRL winger can do on either side of a ball.
Actually Marky Mark is shit under the high ball so maybe rugby backs ignore basic skills far too much
@SBW1 said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
A
n AFLcoach would be a huge asset at the momentin regards to restarts and the aerial game.
Fixed.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
it doesn't even have to be a fucking AFL coach, look at what your average NRL winger can do on either side of a ball.
Actually Marky Mark is shit under the high ball so maybe rugby backs ignore basic skills far too much
I thought the Wallabies were impressive under the high ball vs the Boks last week. Specifically Corey Toole. It wasn't the high ball that cost them the game - in fact it put them in position to win it.
Whatever they are doing seems to be working.
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
MOTM polls vs boks last year (those over 10%):
Clarke, Vaai, Taylor, Jordie, Blackadder
Taylor, Vaai, Sititi, CaneWhich may suggest our best lock ought to be playing lock, we miss Clarke - who Razor left out at the start of the season when available - and we need some loosies who are going to hit attacking rucks. Not that we won those games, mind.
Sorry when did Razor leave out Clarke?
Test 1 this year vs France in Dunedin.
Though he was set to start test 2 before getting injured in training
Reece was out concussed for test #2... Clarke was probably only selected for that one due to injury.
Fassi and Moodie is tall and very good aerial players. Kolbey small but his chasing is excellent. Pollard excellent kicker but not our 9s. Thats a big problem.
@brodean said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Defence is something Proctor seems to be struggling with at test level and I would argue that at test level in tight games defence is more important than passing game at 13.
Agree Rieko could be better than Proctor at test level at this point. And you could be right it is more important than distribtuion.
But rather than trying to pretend distribution doesn't matter for a 13, wouldn't it be nice to have a center who could do both or had developed both.
Damn, this is the All Blacks.
@Frank said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@brodean said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Defence is something Proctor seems to be struggling with at test level and I would argue that at test level in tight games defence is more important than passing game at 13.
Agree Rieko could be better than Proctor at test level at this point. And you could be right it is more important than distribtuion.
But rather than trying to pretend distribution doesn't matter for a 13, wouldn't it be nice to have a center who could do both or had developed both.
Damn, this is the All Blacks.
Im not pretending it doesn't matter. We take the best option we have on balance until something better comes along. We just don't have any proven, complete test center at the moment.
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@KiwiMurph i wonder if the Boks will kick to us?
Well it's not like we didn't also miss an absolute shitload of tackles... making it a tough choice for them to run it or kick it.
Bit of a masterstroke really, they won't know what to do.
Would be great to have some insight from the coaches as to the reluctance to try a 6-2 bench. We seem to have ideal cattle right now with our versatile backs to give it a go, but it seems off the table. Has anyone heard it being discussed by anyone in the setup?