@Billy-Webb said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Given this is an away test, at the fortress Eden Park, the Boks are underdogs by some distance.
This is cause for optimism?
@Billy-Webb said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Given this is an away test, at the fortress Eden Park, the Boks are underdogs by some distance.
This is cause for optimism?
@Billy-Webb said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
The Boks have hardly looked stellar in either of their games so far.
I'm not a fan of the whole 'our team isn't playing well, but neither is the other team so that's okay' argument. Yes, keeping the Eden Park record intact is important but I don't want to watch two team play ordinary rugby against each other and, overall, I'm only concerned with how well the All Blacks are going, if they're improving and if they look like they're on track to being a World Cup contender.
@reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
MOTM polls vs boks last year (those over 10%):
Clarke, Vaai, Taylor, Jordie, Blackadder
Taylor, Vaai, Sititi, CaneWhich may suggest our best lock ought to be playing lock, we miss Clarke - who Razor left out at the start of the season when available - and we need some loosies who are going to hit attacking rucks. Not that we won those games, mind.
Sorry when did Razor leave out Clarke?
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
MOTM polls vs boks last year (those over 10%):
Clarke, Vaai, Taylor, Jordie, Blackadder
Taylor, Vaai, Sititi, CaneWhich may suggest our best lock ought to be playing lock, we miss Clarke - who Razor left out at the start of the season when available - and we need some loosies who are going to hit attacking rucks. Not that we won those games, mind.
Sorry when did Razor leave out Clarke?
Test 1 this year vs France in Dunedin.
Though he was set to start test 2 before getting injured in training
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@akan004 yeah seems they want to protect these guys from injury while ignoring getting them match fit, whereas you'd think if you arent match fit you are more likely to pick up an injury?
It also points to not many if any changes for the Boks test.
@Dan54 said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
I not sure they are restrained, I just genuinely think they look at whole picture and go from there? It probably easier for us we watch game, see someone , decide we like them or not and then excuse them if we do, and rubbish them if we don't. A classic case is Christie, how many people when going crook about him mention he a ranga etc. See I thought he was one of our best backs on weekend. Same as BB, many will come up with he was best sometime ago, and suggest players like Love who has played 3 games at 10 etc. When we don't like players, we see them miss a tackle etc, and get stuck in, we don't look at any breakdown of defense system.
The thing is Dan - they don't look at the whole system in their comments. It's not just that they tend to talk up everyone, it's that they don't seem to critically analyse the ABs either. Without Roigard the ABs have a clear issue with tactical high and long kicking but they won't touch on it. Likewise the ABs restarts are easy fodder compared to the opposition - if it's not a short kickoff they have very little hangtime which helps the opposition to exit - whereas the ABs are having to take hanging restarts around their own 22 with chasers right in their face. They don't touch on it.
Where is the analysis of the backs? There is something fundamentally wrong with the backs currently - legitimately as bad as an AB backline has ever looked. As Dagg touched on - neither wing is adept under the high ball - that's not just on the players - that's on the coaches and selectors.
@booboo said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Canes4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
At least the players I rate become All Blacks.
Iose awaiting the inevitable call up.
Iose isn’t someone that I’ve backed that hard, purely because we don’t need another small-ish 8 at test level. Good Super Rugby player. Higgins for that matter… watch out when he gets fit. 
@SBW1 said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
An AFL coach would be a huge asset at the moment in regards to restarts and the aerial game.
Mick Byrne worked in the day.
it doesn't even have to be a fucking AFL coach, look at what your average NRL winger can do on either side of a ball.
Actually Marky Mark is shit under the high ball so maybe rugby backs ignore basic skills far too much
@SBW1 said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
A
n AFLcoach would be a huge asset at the momentin regards to restarts and the aerial game.
Fixed.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
it doesn't even have to be a fucking AFL coach, look at what your average NRL winger can do on either side of a ball.
Actually Marky Mark is shit under the high ball so maybe rugby backs ignore basic skills far too much
I thought the Wallabies were impressive under the high ball vs the Boks last week. Specifically Corey Toole. It wasn't the high ball that cost them the game - in fact it put them in position to win it.
Whatever they are doing seems to be working.
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
MOTM polls vs boks last year (those over 10%):
Clarke, Vaai, Taylor, Jordie, Blackadder
Taylor, Vaai, Sititi, CaneWhich may suggest our best lock ought to be playing lock, we miss Clarke - who Razor left out at the start of the season when available - and we need some loosies who are going to hit attacking rucks. Not that we won those games, mind.
Sorry when did Razor leave out Clarke?
Test 1 this year vs France in Dunedin.
Though he was set to start test 2 before getting injured in training
Reece was out concussed for test #2... Clarke was probably only selected for that one due to injury.
Fassi and Moodie is tall and very good aerial players. Kolbey small but his chasing is excellent. Pollard excellent kicker but not our 9s. Thats a big problem.
@brodean said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Defence is something Proctor seems to be struggling with at test level and I would argue that at test level in tight games defence is more important than passing game at 13.
Agree Rieko could be better than Proctor at test level at this point. And you could be right it is more important than distribtuion.
But rather than trying to pretend distribution doesn't matter for a 13, wouldn't it be nice to have a center who could do both or had developed both.
Damn, this is the All Blacks.
@Frank said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@brodean said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Defence is something Proctor seems to be struggling with at test level and I would argue that at test level in tight games defence is more important than passing game at 13.
Agree Rieko could be better than Proctor at test level at this point. And you could be right it is more important than distribtuion.
But rather than trying to pretend distribution doesn't matter for a 13, wouldn't it be nice to have a center who could do both or had developed both.
Damn, this is the All Blacks.
Im not pretending it doesn't matter. We take the best option we have on balance until something better comes along. We just don't have any proven, complete test center at the moment.
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
@KiwiMurph i wonder if the Boks will kick to us?
Well it's not like we didn't also miss an absolute shitload of tackles... making it a tough choice for them to run it or kick it.
Bit of a masterstroke really, they won't know what to do.
Would be great to have some insight from the coaches as to the reluctance to try a 6-2 bench. We seem to have ideal cattle right now with our versatile backs to give it a go, but it seems off the table. Has anyone heard it being discussed by anyone in the setup?
Reluctantly adding to the Rieko bash here, because I like the guy as player and it saddens me the way things are at the moment, but there was one moment on the weekend that summed up where is at. It was when the Argies fucked up a pass and the ball was bouncing along the ground. Rieko was there, he bent over to pick it up and spilled the ball forward. Opportunity missed. Rieko of old, or someone else on top of their game, would have either scooped the ball up and accelerated at the gap, or instinctively toed the ball on creating a kick chase situation. I just knew as I watched it unfold, that the chance would be blown.
For what it's worth, I can't imagine any AB back would have made gold out of that situation on the weekend. That's how down on mojo they are as a unit.
@Crazy-Horse a good observation, it does feel like the backline do not have confidence that they can implement whatever gameplan they are being asked to do, and it's impacting their confidence across the board which can lead to missed opportunities like that.
@Bones said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
Will Jordan passed the ball last week though. You pessimistic bunch.
we also look very staunch on the bus on the way in to the stadium.
@junior said in All Blacks v Springboks I:
This is primarily the result of how this and the last regime structured their backline attack and also the two blokes inside him who can’t pass for shit either.
Yeah, his lack of distribution skill is the fault of every coach and every player that has ever played inside him. Nothing to do with him at all............