@reprobate said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@Canes4life said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@reprobate said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@Canes4life said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@reprobate said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@Canes4life said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@MiketheSnow said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
@Bones said in NC: All Blacks v Ireland:
Rattle JGP, get him off his game and they're a bit of a nothing side now.
Same could be said for Roigard
He's easily our most important player and with a strike rate like the below he's going to break plenty of records.
I think he is our most important player, but only due to the lack of similar (in style and quality) options behind him.
Yeah but that’s also purely down to how dominant of a player he is. It’s pretty obvious that Roigard has become the dominant decision maker for the ABs.
Historically it’s been the 10 making most of the big decisions, but in recent years that has shifted to the 9, we’ve seen it with JGP at Ireland and Du Pont at France. 9s are having a lot more say on the game than they used to.
That's not some sort of historical trend mate, it's Sexton retiring and France playing a different style. There have always been some 9s who play that way (Weepu, Going, Bachop to an extent) and 10s who range from very dominant game controllers to just a link in the chain.
Roigard is dominant, and does a lot of the kicking, particularly exits. I would be mildly concerned with how that would go if Roigard gets injured.
The historical consensus in rugby has always been that the No. 10 is the primary game driver - the quarterback, so to speak, while the No. 9's role has largely been to link the forwards with the first five. What we're seeing now, though, is halfbacks taking control of matches more than ever before. One of the major benefits of that shift is that it allows you to blood a young No. 10 like Love much more comfortably, as the bulk of the decision-making no longer rests solely on his shoulders like it traditionally has.
Disagree with you on that one mate, I think it still is the consensus, and all we're seeing is 2 or 3 exceptional players causing a blip on the graph. For me it is kind of just as simple as you get a better view from 10, you're better placed to see things which trigger decisions - and that hasn't changed.
You're totally within your right to disagree as opinions are subjective but I think rush defences have fundamentally changed the role of the first five, with defensive lines now launching so quickly that many 10s receive the ball under immediate pressure. As a result, much of the game's decision-making has shifted to the halfback, who is now responsible for manipulating defenders around the ruck through their running threat, passing variation and ability to keep defences guessing before the ball even reaches first receiver.
Cam Roigard is the perfect example of this change. His greatest strength is his ability to constantly ask questions of the defence, whether that's sniping around the ruck, attacking the fringe, box kicking or firing a flat pass, with his running threat alone forcing defenders to compress and creating opportunities for those around him.
Modern halfbacks also dictate the tempo of the game more than ever before, deciding when to speed play up, slow it down or play for territory, while subtly manipulating defenders through their timing and rhythm. At the same time, attacking responsibilities are now shared across fullbacks, centres and loose forwards, meaning teams are no longer solely reliant on a superstar first five to orchestrate every phase, evident through the pod system that many teams use these days.