Farrell at 12 is done, he’s not enough of a threat with ball in hand and he doesn’t run off Smith’s shoulder. Lawrence should be 12 but our 13 also needs to carry more threat, there are a few around like Northmore at Quins who deserve a run.
Don’t know who could come in as coach now but assuming we haven’t pissed off and insulted F Jones beyond redemption I’d love him to have a go. My conspiracy theory head says that’s why we wouldn’t release him from his contract…
@Billy-Webb said in England vs Springboks:
@Dodge
On an unrelated note - am I over-hyping Sam Underhill's performance?
I thought he was immense.
Why is he not a permanent fixture in the match day 23?
No, I think he should be in the 23, and probably in the XV instead of Curry at this stage - I’ll be honest, I’ve never been much good at identifying the best 6 / 7s. Think we need CCS as he’s the best ball carrier in the tight, think Earl has to be in the back row and then am never sure who’s the best 7 out of Underhill and Curry.
@Dodge said in England vs Springboks:
@Billy-Webb said in England vs Springboks:
@Dodge
On an unrelated note - am I over-hyping Sam Underhill's performance?
I thought he was immense.
Why is he not a permanent fixture in the match day 23?No, I think he should be in the 23, and probably in the XV instead of Curry at this stage - I’ll be honest, I’ve never been much good at identifying the best 6 / 7s. Think we need CCS as he’s the best ball carrier in the tight, think Earl has to be in the back row and then am never sure who’s the best 7 out of Underhill and Curry.
Makes sense from what I have seen - CCS + Earl.
Then you have the luxury of staring either of Curry or Underhill and having the other off the bench.
For me, Underhill could cover 6 & 7
I think CCS should be able to cover 6 and 8, but his hands and skills aren't good enough for 8 yet. Earl and Curry have both played 6, 7 and 8. Underhill covers 6 and 7. Problem is we keep picking Dombrandt on the bench. I like AD against tired defences playing off Smith's shoulder, but our team aren't strong enough to carry a lack of grunt, good in the loose, ball playing 8 at the moment.
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick. We had Billy V at 8 who was really beginning to show his age (although not actually that old) so we bloody well needed that extra speed.
Agreed on both CCS and Dombrandt - I replay like the way he plays for Quins but firstly, England do not play that way and secondly I'm still not sure his game and skillset work at International level. We've seen glimpses where his handling and running lines make a difference but not enough times to cover for all the times he goes missing..
Our bench has been utter dogshit all this series and more frustratingly looked utter dogshit just seeing it written down. That it underwhelmed continually was no surprise at all.
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick. We had Billy V at 8 who was really beginning to show his age (although not actually that old) so we bloody well needed that extra speed.
Maybe I just haven't seen him in a while, but Underhill looked to me like he has bulked up quite a bit?
He's always been very big around the shoulders to be fair. Maybe a bit more added recently but he's never been scrawny.
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick.
Yes it was a lethal combo.
@NTA no doubt you were being hyperbolic to make your point. And there’s no question SA isn’t producing the quality of refs it did but after Watson we gave the world the underrated Mark Lawrence and the best ref of the early pro era: Kaplan.
You’ve also ignored Craig Joubert, who was superb whatever the Whinging Scots and bitter French bleat. I’m biased: in his teens he reffed me all the way up from u14C to Firsts. But in my personal rugby six degrees of separation I’m prouder of being part of his journey than the small part I played in Skinstad, Butch James or Danie Rossouw’s.
Listing these officials reminds me that SA’s loss of rugby capital over the last few decades has been immense. Kaplan should be mentoring young SA refs and reffing schoolboy derbies - instead he emigrated to Canada. Last I heard he was running the MLR officials.
@nostrildamus said in England vs Springboks:
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick.
Yes it was a lethal combo.
England pack is short a serious, angry lump in the front row and, with Chessum injured, a mean Martin Johnson-style 4. Martin is average at best. Doesn’t strike fear in the hearts of jacklers at the breakdown, do much of anything in the lineout and isn’t a significant heavy carrier.
He’s also amongst the worst fringe defenders in test rugby.
All of which puts heavy pressure on loosies and 12 to carry in close and on other tighties in the trenches.
Maybe with Chessum and Angry FR Lump to Be IDed Borthwick could afford to start Earl. It was madness to do so without them against the Boks. Should’ve gone with the biggest, meanest 8 in England with Undehill and C-S (who’s going to be a real weapon when he grows up.) then bring Earl on to run at tired players.
@Smuts said in England vs Springboks:
@nostrildamus said in England vs Springboks:
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick.
Yes it was a lethal combo.
England pack is short a serious, angry lump in the front row and, with Chessum injured, a mean Martin Johnson-style 4. Martin is average at best. Doesn’t strike fear in the hearts of jacklers at the breakdown, do much of anything in the lineout and isn’t a significant heavy carrier.
He’s also amongst the worst fringe defenders in test rugby.
All of which puts heavy pressure on loosies and 12 to carry in close and on other tighties in the trenches.
Maybe with Chessum and Angry FR Lump to Be IDed Borthwick could afford to start Earl. It was madness to do so without them against the Boks. Should’ve gone with the biggest, meanest 8 in England with Undehill and C-S (who’s going to be a real weapon when he grows up.) then bring Earl on to run at tired players.
Totally disagree about Martin, he’s the rock this pack is built on at the moment, the only lock we’ve got that can push in the scrum and carries hard in the loose - I also think he’s mean in the Johnson sense. He’s young and he is not as dynamic as he was at the end of last season. He needs some work around the fringes but maybe him alongside Chessum would be a better combo than him and Maro.
Re that fringe defence, there was an interesting take on the Rugby Pod. Basically that there were a few times normally good fringe defenders got found out and that was not coincidence. The system or maybe the change in defence coach is more likely the issue. Andy Foode made a good point about Joe El Abd was coach of Oyannax who were 16th out of 18 in Div2 of the French league. Is that good enough to warrant promotion to England coach?
@Dodge said in England vs Springboks:
@Smuts said in England vs Springboks:
@nostrildamus said in England vs Springboks:
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Interestingly, when both Curry and Underhill were playing for England together (2019) it was Underhill preferred at 7 with Curry switching to 6. It was actually quite a good balance and of course very quick.
Yes it was a lethal combo.
England pack is short a serious, angry lump in the front row and, with Chessum injured, a mean Martin Johnson-style 4. Martin is average at best. Doesn’t strike fear in the hearts of jacklers at the breakdown, do much of anything in the lineout and isn’t a significant heavy carrier.
He’s also amongst the worst fringe defenders in test rugby.
All of which puts heavy pressure on loosies and 12 to carry in close and on other tighties in the trenches.
Maybe with Chessum and Angry FR Lump to Be IDed Borthwick could afford to start Earl. It was madness to do so without them against the Boks. Should’ve gone with the biggest, meanest 8 in England with Undehill and C-S (who’s going to be a real weapon when he grows up.) then bring Earl on to run at tired players.
Totally disagree about Martin, he’s the rock this pack is built on at the moment, the only lock we’ve got that can push in the scrum and carries hard in the loose - I also think he’s mean in the Johnson sense. He’s young and he is not as dynamic as he was at the end of last season. He needs some work around the fringes but maybe him alongside Chessum would be a better combo than him and Maro.
You’ve watched him more than me. But apart from one good run in the lead up to Underhill’s try I’m not sure I noticed him unless he was getting run over or around.
Itoje may have been ineffective but at least you couldn’t miss him being ineffective
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Re that fringe defence, there was an interesting take on the Rugby Pod. Basically that there were a few times normally good fringe defenders got found out and that was not coincidence. The system or maybe the change in defence coach is more likely the issue. Andy Foode made a good point about Joe El Abd was coach of Oyannax who were 16th out of 18 in Div2 of the French league. Is that good enough to warrant promotion to England coach?
No, it’s not. The appointment is mental and a reflection that serious coaches don’t want to work with Borthwick.
@Dodge said in England vs Springboks:
@Catogrande said in England vs Springboks:
Re that fringe defence, there was an interesting take on the Rugby Pod. Basically that there were a few times normally good fringe defenders got found out and that was not coincidence. The system or maybe the change in defence coach is more likely the issue. Andy Foode made a good point about Joe El Abd was coach of Oyannax who were 16th out of 18 in Div2 of the French league. Is that good enough to warrant promotion to England coach?
No, it’s not. The appointment is mental and a reflection that serious coaches don’t want to work with Borthwick.
Yeah, he was coaching the equivalent of Cambridge.
Cambridge for Christ’s sake.
What’s crazy is that El-abd and Borthwick were roommates at varsity and Borthwick was an usher at old mate’s wedding.
Sure that had no bearing on Borthwick appointing a guy who couldn’t plug the gaping holes around the ruck before meeting SA. That should’ve been priority 1 given the opponent and that the problem was highlighted by AB exploitation and further underlined when the Wobs found the space just as inviting a week later.
Still, systemic problems aren’t the reason guys like Genge missed regulation tackles or The Scrum Anchor dawdled with almost deliberate disinterest into the defensive line.
Speaking of Peyper, are there any other international teams that have a ref sitting in the coaches box?
