So what did we learn from Bled2?

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

If nothing else, Foster has two potential candidates for the 12 jersey who have both played well lately

I think with his aerial game he may be more value against the better teams at 15. Jordie needs more game time at 12 though.

But if opposition teams continue to run through our back line the way Ireland did, it won't matter who is taking the bombs. Not to mention the fact that we barely got any penetration when we had the ball. Besides, both BB and Caleb have shown ability in this regard

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

If nothing else, Foster has two potential candidates for the 12 jersey who have both played well lately

I think with his aerial game he may be more value against the better teams at 15. Jordie needs more game time at 12 though.

But if opposition teams continue to run through our back line the way Ireland did, it won't matter who is taking the bombs. Not to mention the fact that we barely got any penetration when we had the ball. Besides, both BB and Caleb have shown ability in this regard

Depends on how Foster & co. see the whole backline as one unit and how much store they put in known quantities and combinations, I guess. Think they'll want to give him way more time at 12 until RWC2023 though.

@MajorRage said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

Did anyone really think Havili was any kind of longterm prospect at 12? He's a very talented player but never seemed comfortable at 12. In contrast Jordie slotted right in there. Which makes perfect farking sense because that was his preferred position until signing for the Canes and having brick shithouse Laumape at 12.

Assuming Foster actually has a brain and continues to select JB at 12, Havili will still be a handy bench option.

I am not as down on Havili as many others as I think we've seen enough of him to suggest future there. He's had a couple of misreads which have cost, but he certainly hasn't disgraced himself.

Not the misreads that worry me - it's the size and the lack of physicality at times. He can get get bounced backwards offensively, and defensively struggles to put in dominant hits. Having smaller passive defenders can be covered if there are other attributes brought to the table, but playing outside Smith and Mo'unga gets exposed at the top level.

Above all, whether he's the right guy or not, at least the coaches picked one and stuck with them. I'm dying in my own ditch that Laumape could have been our guy there, but he plateaued, got a chip on his shoulder and then left the room.

Also, Havili started brilliantly at 12, albeit against weaker sides. He's been more solid this year, but still not a patch on JB

Was pretty impressed with Jordie on Saturday, and it's interesting isn't it, there seems no doubt he should be starting, it's just where. While I was mightily impressed with his game, I would be keen to see more before I annoint him as the second coming, but if he can repeat that (and was pretty good week before filling in there) a couple of times I will be very happy. I like the triple threat of passing, kicking and running, and with power (where he has it over Havili), and like he can be dominant in defence.

@Chris-B Jeez I'd put money down on 10% . We now have a front row remember; and a 12

@BerniesCorner said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Chris-B Jeez I'd put money down on 10% . We now have a front row remember; and a 12

second favourites behind France...

My team for 2023:

forwards: DeG, ST, Lomax, Ret, Wlock, SBarrett, Papali'i, Savea.

backs: Smith, Mo, JB, Goodhue, Ioane, Jordan, Reece.

subs: Bower/Moody, Newell, Taylor, Va'ai, A.Ioane.

Fakatava, ALB/Clarke, Barrett.

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

If nothing else, Foster has two potential candidates for the 12 jersey who have both played well lately

I think with his aerial game he may be more value against the better teams at 15. Jordie needs more game time at 12 though.

But if opposition teams continue to run through our back line the way Ireland did, it won't matter who is taking the bombs. Not to mention the fact that we barely got any penetration when we had the ball. Besides, both BB and Caleb have shown ability in this regard

I didn’t think our backline defence per se was that bad other than Beaudie and Jordie missing a few tackles in tests 2 and 3. It was more our defensive line when we found ourselves with tight forwards in vulnerable positions wider of the ruck. Ireland exploited that very well.

@chimoaus Yep time is getting short.
I think we nail the colours to the mast .

A Smith - Mo - JB - Ioane - WJ - BB - One other

de Groot - Sami - Lomax - RetLock - Retlock - Savea - Paps - one other

I like the look of that.
Mo kicks
JB occasional howitzer
Captain, Sam the Taller

A Smith - Mo - JB - Ioane - WJ - BB

Look at that, there's some serious x-factor right there

Speed, distribution (JB), no looks (AS), cross kick and mullet

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

Did anyone really think Havili was any kind of longterm prospect at 12? He's a very talented player but never seemed comfortable at 12. In contrast Jordie slotted right in there. Which makes perfect farking sense because that was his preferred position until signing for the Canes and having brick shithouse Laumape at 12.

Assuming Foster actually has a brain and continues to select JB at 12, Havili will still be a handy bench option.

I've been on the anyone by Havili bandwagon ever since he got out muscled by the Bokke last year, and when that continued up north.

However this year he's looked really good.

Not sure why there's a trend here for discarding Clarke.
Defensive lessons can be built on as can familiarity and positioning for linking plays after breaks.
No one can teach his innate abilities and strength to make breaks and half breaks through tackles though and that's a skill none of the other options have.
Reece is in the same bucket as Jordan from what I can see. If Jordan is at 15 then Reece takes his wing otherwise he is backup.

@geeky said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

My team for 2023:

forwards: DeG, ST, Lomax, Ret, Wlock, SBarrett, Papali'i, Savea.

backs: Smith, Mo, JB, Goodhue, Ioane, Jordan, Reece.

subs: Bower/Moody, Newell, Taylor, Va'ai, A.Ioane.

Fakatava, ALB/Clarke, Barrett.

Assume this is what you want, rather than what you predict? If not, you're dreaming and delusional.

No way Ioane moves from 13 now and no way Jordan gets pushed to 15.

I also have no idea why you'd want SB to start at 6, and your only 8 cover is Akira?

@Crucial said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

Reece is in the same bucket as Jordan from what I can see. If Jordan is at 15 then Reece takes his wing otherwise he is backup.

I'd say they are competing for the same spot - but honestly I 'd take Reece. his workrate is amazing, and he does really strong ruck work. Not much in it though, now that WJ has started to perform better

@nzzp said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Crucial said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

Reece is in the same bucket as Jordan from what I can see. If Jordan is at 15 then Reece takes his wing otherwise he is backup.

I'd say they are competing for the same spot - but honestly I 'd take Reece. his workrate is amazing, and he does really strong ruck work. Not much in it though, now that WJ has started to perform better

I think they see Clarke as the specialist left , Jordan as the specialist right , Reece as the guy that covers both spots

@nzzp said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Crucial said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

Reece is in the same bucket as Jordan from what I can see. If Jordan is at 15 then Reece takes his wing otherwise he is backup.

I'd say they are competing for the same spot - but honestly I 'd take Reece. his workrate is amazing, and he does really strong ruck work. Not much in it though, now that WJ has started to perform better

Reece is an odd one isn't he, for a wing he gets through so much work close in, great kick chaser, great footwork in close to the ruck, cleans well as you say. Does he score the try Jordan scored by gassing his outside though?

I think Jordan has the edge, he has that trait that only the special few have, and that's seeming to always get the bounce of the ball. I think he's coming right back into form, and he's the sort of guy who can have that one moment in a big game when we need it most

@voodoo said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

that's seeming to always get the bounce of the ball.

well, sometimes

We tend to have confirmation bias a fair bit. I'm not sure why Reece fell out of favour - he's been the go to for some time. His work in the 2019 pool game against SA was exceptional (I know, a few years ago - but he was superb there).

As an example, Argentina in Ham, the cross kick RM(?) put in fell into the no mans space between WJ and the Argie defender. WJ had a poor game that day, and his indecision about contesting or tackling was noticeable. I wouldn't go as far as 'disinterested' but the workrate you'd like to see was not there.

anyway, quality players both, and not much between them. AB issues are not on the right wing at the moment

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

@nzzp said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@voodoo said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

that's seeming to always get the bounce of the ball.

well, sometimes

We tend to have confirmation bias a fair bit. I'm not sure why Reece fell out of favour - he's been the go to for some time. His work in the 2019 pool game against SA was exceptional (I know, a few years ago - but he was superb there).

As an example, Argentina in Ham, the cross kick RM(?) put in fell into the no mans space between WJ and the Argie defender. WJ had a poor game that day, and his indecision about contesting or tackling was noticeable. I wouldn't go as far as 'disinterested' but the workrate you'd like to see was not there.

anyway, quality players both, and not much between them. AB issues are not on the right wing at the moment

Reece is easily NZ's best right winger, incredible work-rate, brilliant under highball, very strong defensively, & his work off the ball is exceptional, Plus he reads the game really well and always puts himself in the right place at the right time to create opportunities, it's something that gets overlooked but Reece has excellent in-game awareness and intelligence. In my opinion, he's one of the most complete wingers in the world yet Foster doesn't even pick him, it's insane really.

@geeky said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

He's probably one of the most complete wingers in the world, yet Foster doesn't even pick him, it's insane really.

he's going up against someone who has done ridiculous things at lower levels consistently, and is dynamite going forward. I prefer Reece (just), but calling it insane is some kind of hyperbole.

@nzzp I'm a Crusaders fan and reckon Reece has definitely been more influential for us.

Jordan is a bit of a flake on defense and often dies on attack like McKenzie from taking the wrong option or turning over the ball, whereas Reece always keeps the ball alive and always takes the right option, also Reece brings a lot more physicality because of his weight (99kg) and low COG, and the one aspect I love about him is watching how he's constantly working hard to make a positive impact without the ball, something Jordan's learning to develop a bit more now under Schmidt's coaching.

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

@No-Quarter said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

Do you think we will see the high ball again in the RWC? I have Ben Smith at the RWC flashbacks, but Jordie hasn't seemed to be peppered with high balls apart from maybe last year (or was it earlier)...

@nostrildamus said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@No-Quarter said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

Do you think we will see the high ball again in the RWC? I have Ben Smith at the RWC flashbacks, but Jordie hasn't seemed to be peppered with high balls apart from maybe last year (or was it earlier)...

Caleb did just fine. And BB is no slug either

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@nostrildamus said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@No-Quarter said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

Do you think we will see the high ball again in the RWC? I have Ben Smith at the RWC flashbacks, but Jordie hasn't seemed to be peppered with high balls apart from maybe last year (or was it earlier)...

Caleb did just fine. And BB is no slug either

Yes I think I agree with you. For some reason I also trust BB more than JB not to do something totally stupid behind the goal line and get caught...I may have no evidence for this though..

@nostrildamus said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@nostrildamus said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@No-Quarter said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

Do you think we will see the high ball again in the RWC? I have Ben Smith at the RWC flashbacks, but Jordie hasn't seemed to be peppered with high balls apart from maybe last year (or was it earlier)...

Caleb did just fine. And BB is no slug either

Yes I think I agree with you. For some reason I also trust BB more than JB not to do something totally stupid behind the goal line and get caught...I may have no evidence for this though..

Since when have Ferners needed evidence? But I think your assertion is not correct in this case. We do have to protect our catchers better though

This quote from Eddie Jones is showing us why we are no longer able to fatigue the Boks and the NH
teams like we used to.
We need a different game plan with bigger ball carriers. Strong kicking game and a very strong set piece to compete under the rules we have now.
As see Jones comments below we are preparing for games with 35 minutes of ball in play.
We need to speed the game up and dump a whole lot of unnecessary Laws.

“ Twelve months to the World Cup, we’re playing for a game that’s got 35 minutes of ball in play, so the ability to dress-rehearse, prepare the players for what’s coming up, whether it’s the first round, second round, third round, whatever it is, that is the opportunity going forward.”

@Chris said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

This quote from Eddie Jones is showing us why we are no longer able to fatigue the Boks and the NH
teams like we used to.
We need a different game plan with bigger ball carriers. Strong kicking game and a very strong set piece to compete under the rules we have now.
As see Jones comments below we are preparing for games with 35 minutes of ball in play.
We need to speed the game up and dump a whole lot of unnecessary Laws.

“ Twelve months to the World Cup, we’re playing for a game that’s got 35 minutes of ball in play, so the ability to dress-rehearse, prepare the players for what’s coming up, whether it’s the first round, second round, third round, whatever it is, that is the opportunity going forward.”

35 minutes of ball in play is less than 50%. No wonder rugby can be such a snore fest these days

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Chris said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

This quote from Eddie Jones is showing us why we are no longer able to fatigue the Boks and the NH
teams like we used to.
We need a different game plan with bigger ball carriers. Strong kicking game and a very strong set piece to compete under the rules we have now.
As see Jones comments below we are preparing for games with 35 minutes of ball in play.
We need to speed the game up and dump a whole lot of unnecessary Laws.

“ Twelve months to the World Cup, we’re playing for a game that’s got 35 minutes of ball in play, so the ability to dress-rehearse, prepare the players for what’s coming up, whether it’s the first round, second round, third round, whatever it is, that is the opportunity going forward.”

35 minutes of ball in play is less than 50%. No wonder rugby can be such a snore fest these days

yep needs to change and quickly.

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

I'll settle for seeing JB and ALB if Jordie comes out on top up North

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Chris said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

This quote from Eddie Jones is showing us why we are no longer able to fatigue the Boks and the NH
teams like we used to.
We need a different game plan with bigger ball carriers. Strong kicking game and a very strong set piece to compete under the rules we have now.
As see Jones comments below we are preparing for games with 35 minutes of ball in play.
We need to speed the game up and dump a whole lot of unnecessary Laws.

“ Twelve months to the World Cup, we’re playing for a game that’s got 35 minutes of ball in play, so the ability to dress-rehearse, prepare the players for what’s coming up, whether it’s the first round, second round, third round, whatever it is, that is the opportunity going forward.”

35 minutes of ball in play is less than 50%. No wonder rugby can be such a snore fest these days

These days? Mate, it has only improved over the years.

@Machpants said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@canefan said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Chris said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

This quote from Eddie Jones is showing us why we are no longer able to fatigue the Boks and the NH
teams like we used to.
We need a different game plan with bigger ball carriers. Strong kicking game and a very strong set piece to compete under the rules we have now.
As see Jones comments below we are preparing for games with 35 minutes of ball in play.
We need to speed the game up and dump a whole lot of unnecessary Laws.

“ Twelve months to the World Cup, we’re playing for a game that’s got 35 minutes of ball in play, so the ability to dress-rehearse, prepare the players for what’s coming up, whether it’s the first round, second round, third round, whatever it is, that is the opportunity going forward.”

35 minutes of ball in play is less than 50%. No wonder rugby can be such a snore fest these days

These days? Mate, it has only improved over the years.

View image

View embedded content

Wow. That is a disgrace

All these subs don't appear to have had the right effect, which would be to maintain a high match tempo for as long as possible. It has gone down more the American sport model

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

The idea of J Barrett doing a bit of a half break and offloading in contact to a charging R Ioane ( need to put their first initials so we don’t get confused with their brothers ) fills me with all sorts of excitement.

@MN5 said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

The idea of J Barrett doing a bit of a half break and offloading in contact to a charging R Ioane ( need to put their first initials so we don’t get confused with their brothers ) fills me with all sorts of excitement.

TBF, the sentence could probably work with an S and an A too.

@Nepia said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@MN5 said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

The idea of J Barrett doing a bit of a half break and offloading in contact to a charging R Ioane ( need to put their first initials so we don’t get confused with their brothers ) fills me with all sorts of excitement.

TBF, the sentence could probably work with an S and an A too.

Naaaaa, those two are shit, especially Akira.

@MN5 said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Nepia said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@MN5 said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Rancid-Schnitzel said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@KiwiMurph said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

To me Jordie's characteristics suit 12 as opposed to 15 and it suits the balance of the team better.

He's not super quick in open space (remember his time on the wing) and I think he actually kicks better tactically from closer in than he does back at fullback - there are different pictures when kicking up in the line vs at fullback.

Because he's not super quick I think he actually creates more opportunities for others at 12 where can use his power and offloading to create second chance opportunities (not to mention his wide passing game) whereas at 15 he's solid but I didn't find he created many opportunities back there.

Could very well be confirmation bias.

To me it's always been a no-brainer and I've always scratched my head as to why it was dismissed. He played at 12 for the NZ U20s and Canterbury so it's not like he was new to the position. Then add his size, offload, passing game and strong front-on defence and you have a damn good foundation there. As a fb he has the height, boot and aerial skills but, as you say, he doesn't have high-end pace and can be a bit of a carthorse (as opposed to BB and others who can turn on a dime).

Pity Goodhue is injured because I'd love to see that partnership at test level.

The idea of J Barrett doing a bit of a half break and offloading in contact to a charging R Ioane ( need to put their first initials so we don’t get confused with their brothers ) fills me with all sorts of excitement.

TBF, the sentence could probably work with an S and an A too.

Naaaaa, those two are shit, especially Akira.

B and non relative J then?

@No-Quarter said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

@Stargazer said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

I think they should use Jordie at 12 against the big physical teams and persist with Havili against weaker opponents,

I don't know how you rate the current Wobblies squad, but Havilli did pretty damn good against the Boks at Ellis Park - and they are never weak opponents there.

Lol steady on, he was nothing more than solid in that match, and not even in the conversation for MOTM. Jordie is so far ahead of him in every aspect of play it's not even funny, the only question is whether Jordie is at 12 or 15. It seems pretty clear Jordie will be more influential at 12, which pushes Havili to the bench, and then when ALB returns out of the 23.

I'm loathe to want Jordie starting at FB purely for his work under the high ball. That seems an incredibly defensive approach, and it's not like Beauden and Clarke are weak in that regard anyway.

My point was made in response to the view that Havilli is only good for weaker opposition - I think he's better than that.

JB had a really good game on Saturday, but it's only one game (and against a team which some have argued is a weak one). Need to give him more time and see how he goes against NH sides or teams who've analysed his play at 12 first.

@Victor-Meldrew said in So what did we learn from Bled2?:

teams who've analysed his play at 12 first

knowing something is coming and doing something about it are two very different things. Big body running straight is a key rugby requirement at the top level. Then if they doubleteam/stack a defence, space is created elsewhere.

Bring it on, JB at 12, Hayman at 8, 2023 is ours