@Mauss said in Crusaders v Highlanders:
@reprobate said in Crusaders v Highlanders:
Well maybe. He used Robinson and Horrell at fullback so that's a yes... but the likes of Tikoirotuma, Osborne, and particularly Masaga I don't remember as noted distributors. Long time ago now of course.
That is a very long time ago (although I do seem to remember Osborne and Tikoirotuma as more than decent link players but I could be completely imagining that).
Looking at the current Kobe Steelers back 3, it’s noticeable that Rennie wants his outside backs to move the ball. He has used 4 players throughout the competition’s first 11 rounds: Inoke Burua, Kazuma Ueda, Shunsuke Uenobou, and Kanta Matsunaga. Ueda is a finishing winger (more than double the number of carries than passes) but all the rest have a much more balanced ratio of passing to carrying. The fullbacks, Tatsunaga and Uenobou, pass as much as they carry.
The passes and carries per 80 minutes of Rennie’s back 3 at KobeIf we compare this to the back 3 of Tangitau, Clarke and Jordan, then it seems likely that he’ll expect Clarke to pass more frequently and Jordan to find a better balance on when to run and when to pass if he’s going to play at fullback.
Pass-to-carry ratio of the two back 3s: Jordan currently best fits the profile of a winger in a Rennie back 3 (1 pass to every 1.8 carries, similar to Burua)So looking at these numbers, it seems like Rennie at least wants a distributor at fullback. A back 3 of Love or McKenzie at fullback (who average about the same number of carries and passes when playing at fullback), with two of Jordan/Tangitau/Clarke on the wing seems like the most likely scenario to me.
Yeah, I think he will, and I think that's probably the go. Doesn't take much for us to get back to a position where other countries will be envious of the winger we leave out eh?
Also I'd say that I don't think Clarke is necessarily a bad passer, but playing within the Blues structure and being a pretty effective battering ram are going to emphasise those carry numbers.
In isolation I'd prefer McKenzie at 15 over Love, as I think he's a more dangerous runner and he has worked well in a double playmaker role with either Barrett or Mo'unga previously (as opposed to Mo'unga+Barrett which did not work)... but then McKenzie vs Mo'unga (vs Love?) at 10 is an interesting one too. Big season for Love, and whichever way that all pans out, having a third guy who can play 10/15 in a similar style has got to be very valuable with maintaining structure and game plans with injuries/managing workload.



