Now that the dust has settled does the question need to be asked......
Did he do enough to usurp Paddles as our best ever ?
For me, no.
I never imagined a Black Cap would cross that magic 50 average, let alone 54.06 over 110 goddamn test matches. It's world class.
Just for reference that average places him above Tendulkar, Root, Ponting, Dravid, Lara, Border, S Waugh, Gavaskar, Miandad, Richards.....guys who played in and around that number of matches give or take.
2nd to Steve Smith and ahead of Root and Kohli in terms of the other "fab four".
7256 ODI runs at 48.69. Bloody hell that's a fantastic record !
There's always the niggling feeling ( especially on sub continent forums ) that he minnow bashed in New Zealand ( a staggering 65.76 at home vs a still very good 40.95 away ) so there is some truth in what they say.......but lots of players have records that sway that way.
No matter how many runs someone might score a team still needs to take wickets to win matches......
No one did that better for NZ than Paddles, especially during the 80s after a bit of an ironing out period the decade before. Paddles pretty much kicked arse everywhere ( actually slightly better away average of 21.72 vs 22.96 at home )
He didn't get to play Bangladesh, Ireland or Zimbabwe.
KW was surrounded by different degrees of very good cricketers in his career ( albeit no one who challenged him as the teams best player )
Paddles had a supporting cast of some pretty bog standard test players in comparison. Cult heroes for sure but overall not in the class of KWs teammates. Paddles carried the fortunes of NZ cricket pretty much on his own when he played.
Paddles was the first man to 400 test wickets.
Paddles was a better batsman than KW was a bowler.
To sum up, the two best players NZ have produced by quite a margin ( Martin Crowe sits third ), but to me there's a very distinct one and two.
God I wish they had played in the same era !