@Dan54 said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Dan54 said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
i still don't understand how he wasn't penalised for in the side
He actually didn't come in from side, that icture is rubbish, as that's where he ended up. I must be old, butFFS if that a card it's time to pack game in, it was and even in picture clearly shoulder on shoulder contact, and if you can't do that you can't clear out at ruck/maul.
And why would you do it, the same reason as you hit most rucks scrums etc etc etc, even when other team has it, to make tha ball as messy as possible. I not being rude, but thank f*** you fellas never played in teams with me or teams I coached, if you think going passive when opposition got ball!!oh shut up Dan
I've just watched it, he absolutely came in the side. You old fuck, learn about the gate.
"going passive" jesus christ really? why didn't he just ruck a few dudes too. You know, that used to be totally okay 30 years ago as well
Yep fair enough, I just went back on a video and he came from side, but, I repeat if we going to card people for that we in the shit with the game.
No it's not about rucking people, but you don't just stand there because other team has ball in ruck, or do you not want counterrucking where you blow teams back over the ball. That's my main point, is rugby is a game of contest, and if we ever get to the point where we say, ok they have got ball, I will wander off and stand elsewhere, we might as well watch League.
i never said it was a red, but that's opening up for one with a high degree of risk, for no reward.
And it wasn't a counter-ruck, because as noted, then he hits the 7. I've done that heaps, especially because the 7s ribs are open and you can really hurt him
It was dumb because the ref is looking right at him, and he put himself in the refs hands, in 2022, with a reputation. And without a massive ref brainfart, that particular move will lever win us the ball.
But I'm most angry about him abandoning pillar right on the line
@nzzp said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@chimoaus I disagree. Live at the ground it looked dodgy as hell, it really wasn't just a rugby incident or timing.
There was another ruck about the same time, I'll check it as well... It also looked dodgy
With all due respect NZZP, I really think live at ground the ref who was right there would of seen if it dodgy etc, and even TMO etc never seemed to call for replay.
I think almost every counter ruck is similar, and if we can't have shoulder to shoulder contact in rugby , we can't compete!
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Dan54 im sure there are others but you really are the first person ive "met" that would have been surprised if a card was given for that based on similar rulings
this is what is so frustrating, this is just a penalty but we see cards given for things like knock downs
I've never seen a card for a knock down, now you're just making stuff up!
@Dan54 said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crucial It was clear as Crucial, and that was my point, there is no way it was a card,!
I wouldn't say 'clear as'. The trouble here is the ref interpretation (or law ignoring) that judges a finger on the ruck constitutes binding. SB is touching the ruck so doesn't need to come from behind last players. Ireland 6 is touching the ruck so is deemed part of it and the ball not out.
Timing is out from SB because of the ball wasn't picked up. That's what he was pinged for (as an advantage)
@Machpants ive 100% seen a card for "deliberate knock down/on"...and it it wasn't even down, NPC game a couple of years ago, the Otago player reaches and pops the ball up...flys well out of his reach...runs and dives to regather but misses, yellow card, didn't have realistic chance of successfully intercepting
@Crucial said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Dan54 said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crucial It was clear as Crucial, and that was my point, there is no way it was a card,!
I wouldn't say 'clear as'. The trouble here is the ref interpretation (or law ignoring) that judges a finger on the ruck constitutes binding. SB is touching the ruck so doesn't need to come from behind last players. Ireland 6 is touching the ruck so is deemed part of it and the ball not out.
Timing is out from SB because of the ball wasn't picked up. That's what he was pinged for (as an advantage)
I saying it clear it wasn't a card for dangerous play, as ref said it was shoulder on shoulder contact, and that is clearly not a card, if someone wants to say it should of been for something else, well that up to them' Also Ta'avo seems in offside position to me .
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
In breaking news, Caneās injury from earlier this season has flared up and heās been ruled out, Whitelock has caught COVID, Ardie has symptoms - Scott Barrett has been named AB captain
Fuck I hope this is not true, reported anywhere?
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Machpants ive 100% seen a card for "deliberate knock down/on"...and it it wasn't even down, NPC game a couple of years ago, the Otago player reaches and pops the ball up...flys well out of his reach...runs and dives to regather but misses, yellow card, didn't have realistic chance of successfully intercepting
I was taking the piss, no such thing as a knock down (unless you are talking about an opponent), only knock on.
@chimoaus said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
In breaking news, Caneās injury from earlier this season has flared up and heās been ruled out, Whitelock has caught COVID, Ardie has symptoms - Scott Barrett has been named AB captain
Fuck I hope this is not true, reported anywhere?
@Machpants said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Machpants ive 100% seen a card for "deliberate knock down/on"...and it it wasn't even down, NPC game a couple of years ago, the Otago player reaches and pops the ball up...flys well out of his reach...runs and dives to regather but misses, yellow card, didn't have realistic chance of successfully intercepting
I was taking the piss, no such thing as a knock down (unless you are talking about an opponent), only knock on.
fuck you, i just wasted 5 minutes searching to find the video :cat_face_with_tears_of_joy: ...2017 otago v Ta$man if anyone cares
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Machpants said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Machpants ive 100% seen a card for "deliberate knock down/on"...and it it wasn't even down, NPC game a couple of years ago, the Otago player reaches and pops the ball up...flys well out of his reach...runs and dives to regather but misses, yellow card, didn't have realistic chance of successfully intercepting
I was taking the piss, no such thing as a knock down (unless you are talking about an opponent), only knock on.
fuck you, i just wasted 5 minutes searching to find the video :cat_face_with_tears_of_joy: ...2017 otago v Ta$man if anyone cares
Haha, well it's in the laws twice, but nothing to do with the ball!
Law 9: Foul play
A player must not charge or knock down an opponent carrying the ball without attempting to grasp that player.
Law application guidelines
Charging into the ruck
Dangerous charging. A player must not charge or knock down an opponent carrying the ball without trying to grasp that player.
@Machpants i think its clear i was talking about knock on, i just used the term "down" because, knocking it up can be argued there is a chance to intercept but where it cant really if its knocked straight down
should have known someone would be a pedant and point out "the laws say knock ON"
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Machpants i think its clear i was talking about knock on, i just used the term "down" because, knocking it up can be argued there is a chance to intercept but where it cant really if its knocked straight down
should have known someone would be a pedant and point out "the laws say knock ON"
Totally, any chance to be a pain in the arse, I'll take it! But there are certain posters on here that take that term as a personal affront!
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.
holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time. No one can change the facts it was not a penalty, But the offside by SB was.
The 2nd test is 5 days away, the team isnāt named until Thursday (I think itās Thursday, can anyone confirm that?), so there is plenty of time to wasteā¦
@Chris i can concede that if he'd come through the gate then i could be drawn to the shoulder to shoulder/ fair contest side of things....but i kind of figure when you're THAT offside then you're opening yourself up to every inch of criticism
i dont think its unfair to say the irish dude doesn't expect to get hit, he's looking up and seeing one of his guys in front of him, so it is quite different in my mid to the same hit in open play
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time. No one can change the facts it was not a penalty, But the offside by SB was.The 2nd test is 5 days away, the team isnāt named until Thursday (I think itās Thursday, can anyone confirm that?), so there is plenty of time to wasteā¦
Keep wasting your time talking about it, no problems its all hot air anyway.Highlander's will give you something to talk about over the next couple of weeks.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
so no this thread, talking shit, gotcha
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
No, somebody did say it. A few beers in I would imagine.
I imagine the posters defending SB here would have a different option of it was Nepo being that stupid. Both have similar red card brain farts, and poor clean out technique.
As for the comment about going and watching League, a very real possibility of us playing with 13 if those two don't improve this area of their game.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
so no this thread, talking shit, gotcha
Here you go champ
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:
I don't think Scott Barrett can play for the All Blacks again. He should have had another red card. He is just a bit of a dog. With no 20 minute red card he is just a liability.
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
so no this thread, talking shit, gotcha
Here you go champ
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:I don't think Scott Barrett can play for the All Blacks again. He should have had another red card. He is just a bit of a dog. With no 20 minute red card he is just a liability.
ooh i got champed!
so not this thread, and that was hydro TBF, he's big on hot takes.
The boy does skate the line though, that much cannot be dismissed. He's far more of a risk than should be dismissed with the usual red and black "nothing to see here". He's indiscriminate with that shoulder, and his target areas are, shall we say, on the reckless side.
And it's not like he's some newbie who can have his rough edges sanded.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
so no this thread, talking shit, gotcha
Here you go champ
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:I don't think Scott Barrett can play for the All Blacks again. He should have had another red card. He is just a bit of a dog. With no 20 minute red card he is just a liability.
ooh i got champed!
so not this thread, and that was hydro TBF, he's big on hot takes.
The boy does skate the line though, that much cannot be dismissed. He's far more of a risk than should be dismissed with the usual red and black "nothing to see here". He's indiscriminate with that shoulder, and his target areas are, shall we say, on the reckless side.
And it's not like he's some newbie who can have his rough edges sanded.
Not going to argue on your latter points that is true,
But personally sick of hearing about shit that didn't get carded.
You can come back at me if he fucks up this week and I will cop it.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Chris said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
Last thing from me on the Scott Barrett non offence. The Ref saw it as Shoulder on Shoulder so no card,the judiciary didn't see it as a citing offence.
So the debate about an incident that was deemed Ok by the people who really matter is a complete waste of time.No one can change the facts it was not a penalty,But the offside by SB was.holy shit uncircle the wagons cantabs
absolutely no one here is saying it was a fucking red card. no one.
plenty of reasons it was dumb. and it was a penalty. So there's your first proof it was dumb.
Well we have a poster way up this thread saying SB should never be picked in the ABs again and should have been Red carded,massive over reaction so scroll through the whole thread.
quote it so we can have a laugh
Scroll through and see it, I had my say on it I don't want to call the dude out,Its not in my nature to squeal on people.
i've read the whole thread and you are talking shit
Read it again actually it was in the First test thread where all this started after the game.
so no this thread, talking shit, gotcha
Here you go champ
@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Ireland - 1st Test:I don't think Scott Barrett can play for the All Blacks again. He should have had another red card. He is just a bit of a dog. With no 20 minute red card he is just a liability.
ooh i got champed!
so not this thread, and that was hydro TBF, he's big on hot takes.
Haha, that there is one of your best 
@Dan54 I agree, no card, however, he was mere millimetres/milliseconds away from ANOTHER red card, and I expect that one woulda been for 6 plus weeks with his history.
Sure you can argue plenty of incidents are close to red cards, but that was closer than many, glad it lead to nothing, however if he had been carded most eoulda said dumb arse and moved on.
The main issue is, he didn't even need to do it, given he was well off side before he moved anyway...had he been on side he'd not have been in a position to have a crack as he did.
What irritates me most is it was unnecessary, and the timing and manner in which he did it could easily have resulted in a RC because it was already a penalty. All it needed was POM moving the wrong way slightly at the wrong time and it's a shoulder to the face. Nothing about it was in the control of Barrett. Smarter players don't do that on their line.
If the ref was ruling same way for both sides then SB wasnāt offside.
If Green 6 was deemed part of that ruck with a finger touch then Black 6 is too.
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crucial im not sure i follow...you can stand behind you own ruck and not be offside...if anything that might make it worse, its not even a clean out...he's just thumped someone off the ball
SB is touching the ruck so doesnāt have to be behind the last player the way refs rule this (eg guards).
Ireland 6 is also āboundā by a touch. If he picks up the ball when he unbinds he is fair game to SB as the ruck has finished.
Unfortunately the timing was out. SB was offside because he had a crack early not because of where he was standing as many keep saying.
@Crucial said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Crucial im not sure i follow...you can stand behind you own ruck and not be offside...if anything that might make it worse, its not even a clean out...he's just thumped someone off the ball
SB is touching the ruck so doesnāt have to be behind the last player the way refs rule this (eg guards).
Ireland 6 is also āboundā by a touch. If he picks up the ball when he unbinds he is fair game to SB as the ruck has finished.
Unfortunately the timing was out. SB was offside because he had a crack early not because of where he was standing as many keep saying.
He can't pick up the ball, as you can't use your hands when you are in the ruck. As soon as a player is 'unbound' the player must then get back onside to grab the ball or tackle a player
@taniwharugby said in All Blacks Vs Ireland - 2nd Test:
@Dan54 I agree, no card, however, he was mere millimetres/milliseconds away from ANOTHER red card, and I expect that one woulda been for 6 plus weeks with his history.
Sure you can argue plenty of incidents are close to red cards, but that was closer than many, glad it lead to nothing, however if he had been carded most eoulda said dumb arse and moved on.
The main issue is, he didn't even need to do it, given he was well off side before he moved anyway...had he been on side he'd not have been in a position to have a crack as he did.
I understand what you are saying taniwha. my thoughts are well mere millimetres from a red cards is a little overtop, but it may of been within centimetres or whatever, but you can't play the game thinking I can't get involved in case I get a long stand down, you then are not worth your place in team as you playing with handbrake. I in no way suggesting you do silly stuff or anything, but if you are selected to play a test, I really believe you have to play 100% or not play at all. Do we want any player being selected second guessing themselves before doing anything? I don't want us too.
@Dan54 in that situation, it wasnt like a split second decision that he mis-timed and accidentally collected the guys head like so many of the cards we have seen this year...he was in an off side position, both his height and where he was attacking, he was always going to be hitting high on the opposition
Risk vs reward, which in that case, risk far outweighed the reward...but, he got lucky, lucky the Irish player ducked his head when he did, meaning nothing came of it.
I like him as a player, think he brings alot to the table, but he has cost us before, and it doesnt appear he has learnt a great deal, there is a fine line between controlled aggression and stupidity, he seems to be treading with a wide stance.
I hope he doesnt do it again, or worse still, cost us again.