@Higgins said in Foster's Firsts.:
It wasn't that long ago that Ireland were lucky to get off nil and did virtual laps of honour if they fluked it to double figures. Mr. Foster has comfortably erased those from Ireland's goals to aim for.
To be honest every team in world has done that for Ireland, they are seriously a f***en good team, and being No 1 in world doesn't come form beating just ABs. We not that important mate! :confounded_face:
@Steven-Harris said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Machpants and this is the horse the players backed
Could be a very quick exit
it still does my head in that the players opinions had any say in the matter. Foster selected those players, which is a clear conflict of interest, and this is the Robinson that the recent board review apparently praises(?) with its focus on governance...
On the bright side, by the time this gormless saga is over, people will be looking forward to Razor making a clean shave and selecting a smarter tougher team.
Don't lose hope guys!! There's still more first Foster can get.
Of course it'll rely on results going our way but I'm sure the team will be prepared in top metal condition to capitulate when it matters most!
@Donsteppa Foster first…NZ having to focus completely on Italy to ensure the win. That’s quite the come down from times of yore.
I've never been a supporter of Fosters and reckon the AB's lost the plot after Lions 1 in 2017 but a lot of the firsts are a reflection on the available players and the comparative strengths of the opposition.
Making it all about us is a continuation of the arrogance that got us into this mess. We used to be fitter and more skilful than our opponents but no longer are. That's not just down to Foster.
I also don't think Razor is going to be the messiah next year. He'll have the same forwards coach and many of the same players who have now been owned in two successive matches. Hopefully we will have a plan B and won't simply revery to brainless kicking but it's a long way back to the top of world rugby and it's not all about the coach's (in)abilities. Serious structural and competitive concerns too.
The one hope I do have in regards to Razor and the culture/mindset change he can bring is that the Crusaders whilst not being an unbeatable team have always displayed a remarkable ability to get up for the big games.
Case in point being this year when they lost to the Dura and the Chiefs (twice) but still got up for the big dance.
If he can bring that to the AB's it's a big step forward.
Super rugby encourages flowing attacking all action expansive rugby from the Kiwi sides. Which in turn leads to commparatively small forwards who get blown away in the collisions by the bigger packs - almost all of whom can compete with us at the skill level too.
If we can play a continuity game we can hang in there and blow teams away in the 4th quarter. This is what we always used to do but a combination of teams successfully employing the dark arts to slow the game down and having greater depth (than us) so they can run on a practically new pack without any drop in quality has screwed this game plan.
Our lack of Plan B is down to the uniformity of our playing options. Same only not as good.
@dogmeat 16. Samisoni Taukei’aho (25)
Ofa Tu’ungafasi (53)
Fletcher Newell (8)
Tupou Vaa’i (22)
Luke Jacobson (15)
Finlay Christie (17)
David Havili (25)
Leicester Fainga’anuku (3)
Bench vs France: hardly screams run them off their feet in the final 15 minutes. Too much a bob each way selecting. If that is genuinely the plan, then it should be something like Roigard, Taylor or Coles, Leicester, Tamaiti, McKenzie etc.
@dogmeat said in Foster's Firsts.:
I also don't think Razor is going to be the messiah next year.
He doesn't need to be the messiah, he just needs to not be a naughty naughty boy coach.
@booboo said in Foster's Firsts.:
Not quite in the spirit of the thread but ...
Could've, should've, been 4 years ago.
@taniwharugby said in Foster's Firsts.:
@sparky ordinarily I'd say you can't attribute that to the coaching, but there is certainly some issues with our discipline which does come back to coaching
If it’s the coaching things may not get better next year. The Saders get pinged a hell of a lot.
@Crazy-Horse but they didn't get alot of cards do they, and usually a bit more calculated?
@taniwharugby said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Crazy-Horse but they didn't get alot of cards do they, and usually a bit more calculated?
I haven't see any stats but it seems to me they got carded a fair bit too. Or maybe it seemed that way to me because I support them.
@Crazy-Horse I know there is always lenty of chat in match threads about how.much they get away with or deserve cards....
@taniwharugby said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Crazy-Horse I know there is always lenty of chat in match threads about how.much they get away with or deserve cards....
Yeah but I think on here the Saders would be called evil
cheats for helping old ladies across the road.
Penalties not too bad, YCs they ranked 8th this year. 1st (meaning fewest YCs) was the Chiefs
@Nevorian said in Foster's Firsts.:
Foz could be first AB coach to have win ratio below 70% ? Might have to fact check that one
Nah nowhere near (from 2022)
@Machpants well he is teetering on the edge there if you take out those that were obviously sacked early in their tenures and if he manages to lose another one or two…..
I think this is accurate: Foster 2020-2023
Wins: 28 (68.3%)
Losses: 11 (26.8%)
Draws: 2 (4.9%)
So if we bomb out in the QF
Wins: 30 (68.2%)
Losses: 12 (27.3%)
Draws: 2 (4.5%)
I note that almost all those coaches with poorer results got the chop before 4 years. As should have Foster (because at that point his results were even worse).
Some of those guys only had one losing tour, and then were axed. The series loss to Ireland would have been the end of a coach in previous times.
@Machpants said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Nevorian said in Foster's Firsts.:
Foz could be first AB coach to have win ratio below 70% ? Might have to fact check that one
Nah nowhere near (from 2022)
Fred Allen is missing and had a 100% record from 14 Tests. Never lost a game IIRC and had one draw.
There's some names there like Ivan Vodanovich & JJ Stewart I really don't want to ever see again.... And we think the last few years have been a bit shit.
@Chester-Draws said in Foster's Firsts.:
I note that almost all those coaches with poorer results got the chop before 4 years. As should have Foster (because at that point his results were even worse).
Some of those guys only had one losing tour, and then were axed.
The series loss to Ireland would have been the end of a coach in previous times.
Different era. Coaches were appointed according to the touring schedule and being coach for more than a couple of years was very unusual. Coaching GOAT Fred Allen (won all 14 Tests) was only in the job for 2 years and JJ Stewart coached for 3 more years after losing a series at home to England in '73.
The closest parallel to today is Vodanovich who was replaced by the 1970's Coaching Jesus Bob Duff.
@Chester-Draws said in Foster's Firsts.:
I note that almost all those coaches with poorer results got the chop before 4 years. As should have Foster (because at that point his results were even worse).
Some of those guys only had one losing tour, and then were axed. The series loss to Ireland would have been the end of a coach in previous times.
Different times for sure.
They were ruthless on players too, Buck Shelford got dropped because the ABs didn’t beat Scotland convincingly.
Worth pointing out a very good Scots team that had just won a Grand Slam and contained all timers like David Sole, John Jeffrey, Finlay Calder, Gary Armstrong and the Hastings bros.
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Machpants said in Foster's Firsts.:
@Nevorian said in Foster's Firsts.:
Foz could be first AB coach to have win ratio below 70% ? Might have to fact check that one
Nah nowhere near (from 2022)
Fred Allen is missing and had a 100% record from 14 Tests. Never lost a game IIRC and had one draw.
There's some names there like Ivan Vodanovich & JJ Stewart I really don't want to ever see again.... And we think the last few years have been a bit shit.
Yeah I only included the 70% and less which is relevant to the incorrect statement
@MN5 said in Foster's Firsts.:
They were ruthless on players too, Buck Shelford got dropped because the ABs didn’t beat Scotland convincingly.
IIRC our win ratio for the next 5 years plummeted to below 70% when it was nearly 100% under Buck.
Clearly, being ruthless on players worked out well back then.
Bryce Rope (1983 — 1984) 9 1 2 12 75
Bob Duff (1972 — 1973) 6 1 1 8 75
John Hart (1996 — 1999) 31 1 9 41 76
Jack Gleeson (1977 — 1978) 10 0 3 13 77
Brian Lochore (1985 — 1987) 14 1 3 18 78
Neil McPhail (1961, 1963 — 1965) 16 2 2 20 80
John Mitchell (2002 — 2003) 23 1 4 28 82
Peter Burke (1981 — 1982) 9 0 2 11 82
Graham Henry (2004 — 2011) 88 0 15 103 85
Alex Wyllie (1988 — 1991) 25 1 3 29 86
Steve Hansen (2012 — 2019) 93 4 10 107 87
Fred Allen (1966 — 1968) 14 0 0 14 100
Ron Bush (1962) 2 0 0 2 100
Dick Everest (1957) 2 0 0 2 100
Len Clode (1951) 3 0 0 3 100
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster's Firsts.:
@MN5 said in Foster's Firsts.:
They were ruthless on players too, Buck Shelford got dropped because the ABs didn’t beat Scotland convincingly.
IIRC our win ratio for the next 5 years plummeted to below 70% when it was nearly 100% under Buck.
Clearly, being ruthless on players worked out well back then.
Why was Buck the scapegoat?
Everyone knows all about “Bring back Buck” but why was it him and no one else ?
