@Billy-Webb said in Boks v Wobblies I:

(fill in the blank reasons)

Oh come on, we all know your reason is he chose his birth country over the grandparent rule.

@Smuts said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Boks are beatable. Main strike weapon will be maul.

Imminently beatable. Main strike weapon is the maul and the scru…

Imminently beatable. Main strike weapons are the maul and the scrum and Arendse (5 tries in 2 tests against Oz), bugger

Imminently beatable. Amongst their arsenal are such diverse weapons as:
the maul and scrum
Arendse (5 from 2) and
Fassi and Moodie (each 1 from 1)

Also shouldn’t forget the hot hand of Edwill van der Merwe (5 tries in 3 tests for the Boks) aaargh …

I’ll come in again [exit and immediate reentry]

Imminently beatable. Their ever-expanding arsenal is easily underestimated but contains such diverse weapons as:
the maul and scrum
The tryscoring threats of Arendse (5 from 2), Fassi and Moodie (each 1 from 1)
Along with the hot hand of Edwill van der Merwe (5 tries in 3 tests for the Boks)
To say nothing of two-time and current world player of the year PSDT

Bugger.

They are beatable if you can nullify their many and diverse threats.

*eminently

@delicatessen said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@Smuts said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Boks are beatable. Main strike weapon will be maul.

Imminently beatable. Main strike weapon is the maul and the scru…

Imminently beatable. Main strike weapons are the maul and the scrum and Arendse (5 tries in 2 tests against Oz), bugger

Imminently beatable. Amongst their arsenal are such diverse weapons as:
the maul and scrum
Arendse (5 from 2) and
Fassi and Moodie (each 1 from 1)

Also shouldn’t forget the hot hand of Edwill van der Merwe (5 tries in 3 tests for the Boks) aaargh …

I’ll come in again [exit and immediate reentry]

Imminently beatable. Their ever-expanding arsenal is easily underestimated but contains such diverse weapons as:
the maul and scrum
The tryscoring threats of Arendse (5 from 2), Fassi and Moodie (each 1 from 1)
Along with the hot hand of Edwill van der Merwe (5 tries in 3 tests for the Boks)
To say nothing of two-time and current world player of the year PSDT

Bugger.

They are beatable if you can nullify their many and diverse threats.

*eminently

As we get closer it will be imminently again.

@delicatessen My bad. I realised I’d mistyped, but after @smuts had taken the bait so magnificently, there seemed little point in correcting!

@mariner4life said in Boks v Wobblies I:

word is JOC to start at 10?

Let’s go ‘straya

Supposedly SARU have buggered the pricing strategy for this one and there's gonna be a load of empty seats

@KiwiMurph said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Supposedly SARU have buggered the pricing strategy for this one and there's gonna be a load of empty seats

It's about 100NZD for the cheapest tickets, from what I've seen. Which is criminal in SA.

When is the team named?

What happens if JOC goes down???

I imagine niggles played a part, but I’d have had LSL on bench.

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

What happens if JOC goes down???

Tupou happens.

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

What happens if JOC goes down???

I think that Wright would move into 1st 5 and Kellaway comes on at fullback.

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

What happens if JOC goes down???

Schmidt has side they may still tweak the bench as the Donaldson injury happened late Thursday.

Kellaway can play 10 or someone like Paisami or Edmed could come onto the bench

Nic White can actually play 10 also.

@pakman Watching that - I wouldn't mind him coaching the ABs.
And I loved him throwing shade on Rassie by omission. Repeatedly giving praise to Tony Brown, Felix Jones, and "the athletes he has at hand" - but... the unsaid was greater than the said.

Unfortunately no story here. Just a genuine injury to a reserve prop requiring a like for like replacement.

Schmidt however, was the first to blink by dropping a forward for a reserve 10. (Rightly so, Madness to be reliant on a 35 y/o SR part timer)

@PN said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Unfortunately no story here

But Rassie.

Still a genius.

@booboo said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@PN said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Unfortunately no story here

But Rassie.

Still a genius.

The reeducation camp youve been attending has finally got reality sinking in mate!

Edmed to bench in place of CdC

To be fair the original squad was named within an hour of Donno going down.

@MiketheSnow Heard that before Mike. Pride comes before a fall, and the Boks are not always at their best when they are heavily favoured.

One red card could change a lot

@stodders said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@MiketheSnow Heard that before Mike. Pride comes before a fall, and the Boks are not always at their best when they are heavily favoured.

One red card could change a lot

So Mike’s neutral take on the match somehow becomes, in your view, “Springbok arrogance”? That’s quite a leap.

Out of interest—what exactly was the moment that marked the All Blacks’ own “pride before a fall”?

Some commentary and second guessing I'm not following on this thread...
So here's my uneducated view:
Boks favourites. Why? Because they're good, and at home, and at altitude - always an adjustment.
BUT: I believe this is is a vastly underrated Wallaby team. They have been well hardened by the Lions Tour. Being underdogs is going to play into their hands. They could (need to) front up to Bok aggression in the pack, and if they do, they have some electric players out wide. This will be a close one.

These are all very nice words I'm seeing.

Boks by 23.

@OomPB which of the Boks locks will play 80?

@PN 2007. Thrashed the French 3 times in 12 months, then turned up without the necessary fire in that Quarter Final. It was a necessary lesson for them to learn that took them to back to back WCs and domination in between.

As for the Boks, they aren’t really more arrogant than any other team. My comment was more directed at some of their fans and media, who are reaching insufferable levels at the moment. (Note the word some before clambering up on your high horse).

Anyone talks about rugby online, it is swiftly hijacked by a Bok fan pointing out a perceived sleight against them or not giving them enough love or admiration .

Were NZ fans arrogant during the golden years? Sure. Did people hurl bile at them? Yep. Bok fans have claimed the mantle now. If you don’t believe me, have a Quick Look on X or rugby forums and you’ll find the ones I refer to

@PN I didn’t say the Boks were arrogant in my response to Mike. Mike was supremely confident that the Boks will thump the Wallabies in 3rd gear. My pride comes before a fall was aimed towards Mike.

Yet you spun it to be about the Boks

See my previous post and add yourself to the list of anecdotal evidence

@stodders said in Boks v Wobblies I:

@PN I didn’t say the Boks were arrogant in my response to Mike. Mike was supremely confident that the Boks will thump the Wallabies in 3rd gear. My pride comes before a fall was aimed towards Mike.

Still am and only had one sip of my Guinness

Cracking movement and continuity

Fantastic ball movement and support lines

I’m missing this game for what I believe is a fair excuse: emergency call up to our 3rd grade side at [drumroll] … 10. Once I was assured the Club would provide hair gel couldn’t turn down the chance to hunt ruckrats and 1st5s from where they’d least expect it.

@Smuts good luck Smuts

The levee can’t take these constant, consistent, brutal waves

The Boks would pump the Lions.

Well if anyone thought the Boks were under cooked. They look very slick

@MiketheSnow you may have been right Mike

Do the Wallabies have any defensive line speed at all? Looks like their feet are in concrete.